ArticleERJ open research2021
Nasal upregulation of
Article in ERJ open research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in clinical examination techniques for allergic rhinitis: a review from traditional testing to precision diagnosis.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
- The functional role of CST1 and CCL26 in asthma development.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2024Article
- Type 2 Cystatins and Their Roles in the Regulation of Human Immune Response and Cancer Progression.Cancers · 2023Review
- CST1 promotes the proliferation and migration of PDGF-BB-treated airway smooth muscle cells via the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2023Article
- Transcriptomic analysis of asthma and allergic rhinitis reveals CST1 as a biomarker of unified airways.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Current Insights on the Impact of Proteomics in Respiratory Allergies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe clinical presentation of children sensitised to dog dander varies from asymptomatic to severe allergic airway disease, but the genetic mechanisms underlying these differences are not clear. The objective of the present study was to investigate nasal transcriptomic profiles associated with dog dander sensitisation in school children and to reveal clinical symptoms related with these profiles.
methodsRNA was extracted from nasal epithelial cell brushings of children sensitised to dog dander and healthy controls. Blood sample analyses included IgE against dog dander, dog allergen molecules, other airborne and food allergens, basophil activation and white blood cell counts. Clinical history of asthma and rhinitis was recorded, and lung function was assessed (spirometry, methacholine provocation and exhaled nitric oxide fraction).
resultsThe most overexpressed gene in children sensitised to dog dander compared to healthy controls was
conclusionsOverexpression of
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.