ReviewmHealth2021
Scale up mHealth HIV interventions: site and public health perspectives and lessons learned from P3.
Review in mHealth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility and Acceptability of a mHealth Patient Navigation Intervention to Increase Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Uptake in Racially and Ethnically Diverse Sexual and Gender Minority Youth in Los Angeles (PrEPresent): Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR formative research · 2025Trial
- Feasibility of the Adapted MyPEEPS Mobile App for HIV Prevention in Young Transgender Men.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2025Trial
- Expanding the Evidence on the Safety and Efficiency of 2-Way Text Messaging-Based Telehealth for Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision Follow-up Compared With In-Person Reviews: Randomized Controlled Trial in Rural and Urban South Africa.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Trial
- Scaling-up an mHealth system to deliver financial incentives to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy in Tanzania.Implementation science communications · 2025Article
- Centering Youth Voice in the Adaptation of an mHealth Intervention for Young Adults With HIV in South Texas, United States: Human-Centered Design Approach.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Article
- Co-creation using crowdsourcing to promote PrEP adherence in China: study protocol for a stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A number of mobile health (mHealth) interventions have been shown to be effective and highly acceptable tools for improving human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention and care for youth. Scale-up of efficacious technology-based interventions is challenging and best practices for scale-up have not been clearly established. Developers of mHealth interventions should have plans in mind for wide scale implementation throughout all stages of development including planning, during trials and during analysis and dissemination. We discuss an approach of focus on researchers, funders and potential implementers including members of the community, public health practitioners and policymakers during initial planning, trials, analysis and dissemination, and planning for scale-up. Development of the P3 (Prepared, Protected, emPowered) mobile application (app), an intervention built to encourage and increase pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence among young men who have sex with men (YMSM) and young transgender women who have sex with men (YTWSM), is discussed in terms of designing for scale-up and lessons learned.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.