Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33898601›Full record

ReviewmHealth2021

Mobile app development in health research: pitfalls and solutions.

Aaron J Siegler, Justin Knox, José A Bauermeister, Jesse Golinkoff, Lisa Hightow-Weidman, Hyman Scott

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mHealth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Aaron J SieglerDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Justin KnoxDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
José A BauermeisterDepartment of Family & Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jesse GolinkoffDepartment of Family & Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lisa Hightow-WeidmanDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Hyman ScottBridge HIV, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USColumbia University · USEmory University · USSan Francisco Department of Public Health · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Virology and Molecular Biomarkers CoreP30AI050409 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Ann M Chahroudi, Colleen F Kelley · 2002 to 2026
$74.0M
The UNC/Emory Center for Innovative Technology (iTech) across the prevention and care continuumU19HD089881 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HIGHTOW-WEIDMAN, LISA B, SULLIVAN, PATRICK SEAN · 2016 to 2022
$35.8M
Population-based survey of SARS-CoV-2 infection and immune responseR01AI143875 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SIEGLER, AARON JULIUS, SULLIVAN, PATRICK SEAN · 2019 to 2023
$9.2M
Making it last: A randomized, controlled trial of a home care system to promote persistence in PrEP careR01MH114692 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI MAYER, KENNETH H, SIEGLER, AARON JULIUS · 2017 to 2021
$5.8M
Intervening to improve HIV treatment and reduce drinking in young, black men who have sex with menK01AA028199 · NIAAA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI KNOX, JUSTIN · 2020 to 2024
$865k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA028199NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050409NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI143875NICHD NIH HHS U19 HD089881NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobile app health research presents myriad opportunities to improve health, and simultaneously introduces a new set of challenges that are non-intuitive and extend beyond typical training received by researchers. Informed by our experiences with app development for health research, we discuss some of the most salient pitfalls when working with emerging technology as well as potential strategies to avoid or resolve these challenges. To address challenges at the project level, we suggest strategies that researchers can use to future-proof their research, such as using theory and involving those with app development expertise as part of a research team. At the structural level, we include a new model to characterize the relationship between technology- and research-timelines, and provide ideas regarding how to best address this challenge. Given that screen-based time now predominates our lived experiences, it is important that health researchers have the capacity and structural support to develop interventions that utilize these technologies, assess them rigorously, and ensure their timely and equitable dissemination.

Indexed as

Health researchinterventionstechnology

Identifiers

PMID33898601
PMCPMC8063010
OpenAlexW3038568192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.