Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33898235›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife2021

Molecular confirmation of high prevalence of species of

Edward C Netherlands, Carlie Stroebel, Louis H du Preez, Ntji Shabangu, P Tshepo Matjila, O Louis van Schalkwyk, Barend L Penzhorn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Life cycle stages ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. First detection and molecular identification ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Edward C NetherlandsAfrican Amphibian Conservation Research Group, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
Carlie StroebelAfrican Amphibian Conservation Research Group, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
Louis H du PreezAfrican Amphibian Conservation Research Group, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
Ntji ShabanguVectors and Vector-borne Diseases Research Programme, Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, 0110, South Africa.
P Tshepo MatjilaVectors and Vector-borne Diseases Research Programme, Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, 0110, South Africa.
O Louis van SchalkwykOffice of the State Veterinarian, Kruger National Park, Skukuza, 1350, South Africa.
Barend L PenzhornVectors and Vector-borne Diseases Research Programme, Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, 0110, South Africa.
North-West University · ZAUniversity of Pretoria · ZAOnderstepoort Veterinary Academic Hospital · ZASouth African National Parks · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reports in the literature indicate that species of

Indexed as

African wild dogHepatozoon canisHepF300HepR900Kruger National ParkLycaon pictusPCR screening

Identifiers

PMID33898235
PMCPMC8056134
OpenAlexW3139328573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.