Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33898215›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone oncology2021

Delay in diagnosis of primary osteosarcoma of bone in children: Have we improved in the last 15 years and what is the impact of delay on diagnosis?

Shinichirou Yoshida, James Celaire, Chloe Pace, Charles Taylor, Yoichi Kaneuchi, Scott Evans, Adesegun Abudu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Biomaterials for Orthopaedic Diagnostics and Theranostics.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shinichirou YoshidaThe Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Bristol Road South, Northfield, Birmingham B31 2AP, Birmingham, UK.
James CelaireThe Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Bristol Road South, Northfield, Birmingham B31 2AP, Birmingham, UK.
Chloe PaceThe Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Bristol Road South, Northfield, Birmingham B31 2AP, Birmingham, UK.
Charles TaylorThe Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Bristol Road South, Northfield, Birmingham B31 2AP, Birmingham, UK.
Yoichi KaneuchiThe Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Bristol Road South, Northfield, Birmingham B31 2AP, Birmingham, UK.
Scott EvansThe Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Bristol Road South, Northfield, Birmingham B31 2AP, Birmingham, UK.
Adesegun AbuduThe Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Bristol Road South, Northfield, Birmingham B31 2AP, Birmingham, UK.
Royal Orthopaedic Hospital · GBFukushima Medical University · JPTohoku University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsExamine: (1) If length of symptoms (LS) of children with osteosarcoma has improved in the last 15 years (2) Is delay in diagnosis related to the presence of metastases at presentation? (3) The impact of delay in diagnosis on prognosis.

methods250 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of osteosarcoma of bone treated at a national bone tumor treatment center between 2004 and 2018 were studied retrospectively. Three groups comprising those diagnosed over a five-year period (Group 1: 2004-2008, Group 2: 2009-2013; Group 3: 2014-2018) were studied.

resultsThere were 126 males and 124 females with a mean age 12.2 years. The median LS for all patients was eight weeks. The median LS for Group 3 was significantly shorter than that for other groups. Development of metastasis during follow-up period was significantly less in Group 3 compared to the other groups. Overall survival gradually improved over the whole study period. There was no difference in the proportion presenting with metastases at diagnosis between the three groups. The survival rates in patients with LS shorter than 4 weeks was better than those with LS longer than 4 weeks, irrespective of the study time period.

conclusionsThere has been an improvement in the LS in patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma over the last 15 years. The development of metastasis during follow-up has reduced and the overall survival in the last 15 years has improved. LS longer than 4 weeks is associated with a poorer prognosis.

Indexed as

Delayed diagnosisOsteosarcomaPediatric osteosarcomaPrognostic factorSymptom length

Identifiers

PMID33898215
PMCPMC8056435
OpenAlexW3142489198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.