Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33898152›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Current Milestones Assessment Practices, Needs, and Challenges of Program Directors: A Collective Case Study in a Pediatric Hospital Setting.

Kadriye O Lewis, Susan B Hathaway, Denise Bratcher, Douglas Blowey, Jane F Knapp

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A new era of assessment for neonatal-perinatal medicine trainees: milestones 2.0.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Review
  5. Milestones Next Steps: Results of a Feedback Questionnaire.Journal of graduate medical education · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kadriye O LewisDepartment of Pediatrics, Graduate Medical Education, Children's Mercy Hospital, University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, USA.
Susan B HathawayDepartment of Pediatrics, Graduate Medical Education, Children's Mercy Hospital, University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, USA.
Denise BratcherDepartment of Pediatrics, Graduate Medical Education, Children's Mercy Hospital, University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, USA.
Douglas BloweyNephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Hospital, University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, USA.
Jane F KnappDepartment of Pediatrics, Graduate Medical Education, Children's Mercy Hospital, University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, USA.
Children's Mercy Hospital · USKansas City Public Schools · USMercy Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's (ACGME's) Milestones assessment requirement has placed new demands on Program Directors (PDs), especially those with limited knowledge of assessment and evaluation activities. There is a lack of clarity on how Program Director (PDs)/Associate PDs (APDs) are effectively implementing milestones assessment and evaluation practices in the Graduate Medical Education programs. The purpose of this study was to investigate current assessment practices, needs, and challenges of PDs in implementing milestones assessment within their residency and fellowship programs in a pediatric hospital setting. Methods This study used a collective case study approach to obtain information from PDs, APDs, and Clinical Competency Committee (CCC) Chairs in 19 graduate programs at a pediatric hospital. We used structured meetings with planned agendas and a pre-formatted template to itemize program needs/difficulties/challenges in the milestone assessment. We used cross-case thematic content anal-ysis to identify categories and themes to compare differences and commonalities across programs. Results A total of 38 PDs, APDs, and CCC Chairs from 19 different specialties/subspe-cialties participated in this study. Thirteen types of assessment and evaluation tools were consistently used across programs. Three categories emerged in relation to those assessment and evaluation types (direct, indirect, and multi-source). Rotation evaluation (84.2%), direct observation (73.2%), and 360-degree assessment (68.4%) were primarily used for measuring patient care among the six core competencies. Programs' needs varied from curriculum and assessment tool development to alignment of milestones items, and to creating a sys-tematic assessment management plan. The most common challenges were difficulties related to logistics and tracking of evaluation in the survey management system (52.6%), challenges with time management (47.3%), and difficulty in determining and interpret-ing the milestones' numbers and levels (31.5%). Conclusions Milestones assessment and evaluation in medical education can be a challenge, but a priority for many training programs. Our study indicated that milestones assessment and evaluation in medical education are far more com-plex than we expect. Multiple assessment methods must be utilized to evaluate all essential competencies for accurate measurement of trainees' performance abilities. Our study uncovered several issues PDs faced during the implementation of milestones assessment and needs and challenges.

Indexed as

milestones assessment and evaluationmilestones challengespediatric milestonesprogram directors’ assessment practicesprogram needs

Identifiers

PMID33898152
PMCPMC8059776
OpenAlexW3156344184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.