Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33898011›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2021

From a crisis to an opportunity: Eight insights for doing science in the COVID-19 era and beyond.

Julia Chacón-Labella, Mickey Boakye, Brian J Enquist, William Farfan-Rios, Ragnhild Gya, Aud H Halbritter, Sara L Middleton, Jonathan von Oppen, Samuel Pastor-Ploskonka, Tanya Strydom and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Julia Chacón-LabellaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Arizona Tucson AZ USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6787-1295
Mickey BoakyeDepartment of Environmental Science Policy and Management University of California Berkeley CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6557-9928
Brian J EnquistDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Arizona Tucson AZ USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6124-7096
William Farfan-RiosCenter for Conservation and Sustainable Development Missouri Botanical Garden St Louis MO USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3196-0317
Ragnhild GyaDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Bergen Bergen Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2483-2069
Aud H HalbritterDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Bergen Bergen Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2597-6328
Sara L MiddletonDepartment of Zoology University of Oxford Oxford UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5307-8029
Jonathan von OppenSection for Ecoinformatics & Biodiversity Department of Biology Aarhus University Aarhus C Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6346-2964
Samuel Pastor-PloskonkaHerbario Nacional de Bolivia Universidad Mayor de San Andrés La Paz Bolivia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8505-7660
Tanya StrydomDepartment of Ecology Environment and Plant Sciences Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6067-1349
Vigdis VandvikDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Bergen Bergen Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4651-4798
Sonya R GeangeDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Bergen Bergen Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5344-7234

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 crisis has forced researchers in Ecology to change the way we work almost overnight. Nonetheless, the pandemic has provided us with several novel components for a new way of conducting science. In this perspective piece, we summarize eight central insights that are helping us, as early career researchers, navigate the uncertainties, fears, and challenges of advancing science during the COVID-19 pandemic. We highlight how innovative, collaborative, and often Open Science-driven developments that have arisen from this crisis can form a blueprint for a community reinvention in academia. Our insights include personal approaches to managing our new reality, maintaining capacity to focus and resilience in our projects, and a variety of tools that facilitate remote collaboration. We also highlight how, at a community level, we can take advantage of online communication platforms for gaining accessibility to conferences and meetings, and for maintaining research networks and community engagement while promoting a more diverse and inclusive community. Overall, we are confident that these practices can support a more inclusive and kinder scientific culture for the longer term.

Indexed as

data sharingearly careerinclusivitynetworkingonline collaborationskill development

Identifiers

PMID33898011
PMCPMC8057324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.