Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33898010›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2021

Next-generation field courses: Integrating Open Science and online learning.

Sonya R Geange, Jonathan von Oppen, Tanya Strydom, Mickey Boakye, Tasha-Leigh J Gauthier, Ragnhild Gya, Aud H Halbritter, Laura H Jessup, Sara L Middleton, Jocelyn Navarro and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Registered Reports: A new chapter atEcology and evolution · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 12 institutions in 6 countries.

Sonya R GeangeDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Bergen Bergen Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5344-7234
Jonathan von OppenSection for Ecoinformatics & Biodiversity Department of Biology Aarhus University Aarhus C Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6346-2964
Tanya StrydomDepartment of Ecology Environment and Plant Sciences Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6067-1349
Mickey BoakyeDepartment of Environmental Science Policy and Management University of California Berkeley CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6557-9928
Tasha-Leigh J GauthierDepartment of Geography University of Waterloo Waterloo ON Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1414-0958
Ragnhild GyaDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Bergen Bergen Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2483-2069
Aud H HalbritterDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Bergen Bergen Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2597-6328
Laura H JessupDepartment of Forestry and Natural Resources Purdue University West Lafayette IN USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1544-9631
Sara L MiddletonDepartment of Zoology University of Oxford Oxford UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5307-8029
Jocelyn NavarroDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Arizona Tucson AZ USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5699-097X
Maria Elisa PierfedericiFaculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management Norwegian University of Life Sciences Ås Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6882-6576
Julia Chacón-LabellaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Arizona Tucson AZ USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6787-1295
Sehoya CotnerDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Bergen Bergen Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3324-9430
William Farfan-RiosLiving Earth Collaborative Washington University St Louis MO USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3196-0317
Brian S MaitnerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Arizona Tucson AZ USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2118-9880
Sean T MichaletzDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2158-6525
Richard J TelfordDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Bergen Bergen Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9826-3076
Brian J EnquistDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Arizona Tucson AZ USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6124-7096
Vigdis VandvikDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Bergen Bergen Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4651-4798
Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research · NOUniversity of Arizona · USAarhus University · DKAntioch University Seattle · USNorwegian University of Life Sciences · NOPurdue University West Lafayette · USStockholm University · SEUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As Open Science practices become more commonplace, there is a need for the next generation of scientists to be well versed in these aspects of scientific research. Yet, many training opportunities for early career researchers (ECRs) could better emphasize or integrate Open Science elements. Field courses provide opportunities for ECRs to apply theoretical knowledge, practice new methodological approaches, and gain an appreciation for the challenges of real-life research, and could provide an excellent platform for integrating training in Open Science practices. Our recent experience, as primarily ECRs engaged in a field course interrupted by COVID-19, led us to reflect on the potential to enhance learning outcomes in field courses by integrating Open Science practices and online learning components. Specifically, we highlight the opportunity for field courses to align teaching activities with the recent developments and trends in how we conduct research, including training in: publishing registered reports, collecting data using standardized methods, adopting high-quality data documentation, managing data through reproducible workflows, and sharing and publishing data through appropriate channels. We also discuss how field courses can use online tools to optimize time in the field, develop open access resources, and cultivate collaborations. By integrating these elements, we suggest that the next generation of field courses will offer excellent arenas for participants to adopt Open Science practices.

Indexed as

career developmentearly career researchersFAIR principleshigher educationpedagogyreproducible research

Identifiers

PMID33898010
PMCPMC8057340
OpenAlexW3109161532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.