Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33898003›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2021

Fostering equity, diversity, and inclusion in large, first-year classes: Using reflective practice questions to promote universal design for learning in ecology and evolution lessons.

Laura Super, Analise Hofmann, Connie Leung, Mabel Ho, Emma Harrower, Najah Adreak, Zohreh Rezaie Manesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura SuperForest and Conservation Sciences The University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5259-8708
Analise HofmannCellular and Physiological Sciences The University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada.
Connie LeungCellular and Physiological Sciences The University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada.
Mabel HoCurriculum Developer Dalhousie University Halifax NS Canada.
Emma HarrowerVancouver BC Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1137-115X
Najah AdreakSurgery Department Faculty of Medicine The University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada.
Zohreh Rezaie ManeshForest and Conservation Sciences The University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Instructors can deliberately design for equity, diversity, and inclusion, including for large first-year classes, and now instructors have added challenges given COVID-19. Our paper explores the question: How do we integrate equity, diversity, and inclusion and universal design for learning (UDL) into first-year, undergraduate ecology and evolution introductory lessons given the COVID-19 pandemic? Given the large field exploring equity, diversity, and inclusion, we chose to focus on developing reflective practice question rubrics for before, during, and after lessons to encourage UDL for instructors, teaching assistants, and learners. We conducted a focus group within our team and discussed ideas related to online learning, including related pitfalls and solutions. Lastly, we created a figure to illustrate ideas and end with a general discussion. Our reflective practice questions for UDL rubrics, figure, focus group, and discussion aim to increase positive action for equity, diversity, and inclusion in the classroom and beyond.

Indexed as

diversity and inclusionequityreflective practiceuniversal design for learning

Identifiers

PMID33898003
PMCPMC8057341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.