Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33897978›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2021

Mechanical behavior of actin and spectrin subjected to high strain rate: A molecular dynamics simulation study.

Md Ishak Khan, Sheikh Fahad Ferdous, Ashfaq Adnan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Molecular and structural basis of actin filament severing by ADF/cofilin.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  9. Viscoelastic damage evaluation of the axon.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Md Ishak KhanDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA.
Sheikh Fahad FerdousDepartment of Applied Engineering and Technology Management, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN 47809, USA.
Ashfaq AdnanDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent nanoscopy and super-resolution microscopy studies have substantiated the structural contribution of periodic actin-spectrin lattice to the axonal cytoskeleton of neuron. However, sufficient mechanical insight is not present for spectrin and actin-spectrin network, especially in high strain rate scenario. To quantify the mechanical behavior of actin-spectrin cytoskeleton in such conditions, this study determines individual stretching characteristics of actin and spectrin at high strain rate by molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. The actin-spectrin separation criteria are also determined. It is found that both actin and spectrin have high stiffness when susceptible to high strain rate and show strong dependence on applied strain rate. The stretching stiffness of actin and forced unfolding mechanism of spectrin are in harmony with the current literature. Actin-spectrin model provides novel insight into their interaction and separation stretch. It is shown that the region vulnerable to failure is the actin-spectrin interface at lower strain rate, while it is the inter-repeat region of spectrin at higher strain rate.

Indexed as

ActinAxonAxonal cytoskeletonHigh strain rateMechanical behaviorSpectrin

Identifiers

PMID33897978
PMCPMC8050423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.