Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33897961›Full record

Observational studyJournal of graduate medical education2021

Interruptions to Attending Physician Rounds and Their Effect on Resident Education.

Julia Armendariz, Carla Tamayo, Justin Slade, Ilana Belitskaya-Lévy, Caroline Gray, Nazima Allaudeen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of graduate medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Education During Ward Rounds: Systematic Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2022
    Review
  6. Bedside Teaching in Rural Family Medicine Education in Japan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia ArmendarizAt the time of research, was an Internal Medicine Resident, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, and is now an Internal Medicine Physician, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System.
Carla TamayoAt the time of research, was an Internal Medicine Resident, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, and is now an Internal Medicine Physician, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Justin SladeAt the time of research, was Physician Scholar in Quality and Patient Safety, Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, and is now a Cardiology Fellow, Department of Cardiology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco.
Ilana Belitskaya-Lévyis a Biostatistician, Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System.
Caroline Grayis Research Sociologist, Center for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System.
Nazima Allaudeenis Assistant Professor (Affiliated), Stanford School of Medicine, and Director of Quality Improvement, Inpatient Medicine, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System.
VA Palo Alto Health Care System · USStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDaily attending rounds (AR) are a cornerstone of teaching and patient care in academic health centers. Interruptions in health care are common and can cause increased risk of errors, incomplete work, and decreased decision-making accuracy. Interruptions to AR may diminish a trainee's capacity to learn and retain information.

objectiveWe characterized and quantified interruptions that occur during AR.

methodsWe used a mixed

resultsThere were 378 observed interruptions over the course of 30 AR sessions, averaging 12.6 (range 1-22, median 13) interruptions per rounding session. Bedside nursing staff was the most common source of interruptions (25%) and consultant recommendations was the most common topic of interruption (21%). Most interruptions occurred during patient presentations (76%), and the most common method of interaction was text message (24%). Most team members described negative effects of interruptions, including loss of focus and missing critical clinical information; some also reported that certain interruptions had positive effects on education and clinical care. Interns were more likely to report negative emotional reactions to interruptions.

conclusionsAR are frequently interrupted for non-urgent topics by a variety of methods and sources. Negative effects included loss of focus, missed information, and increased stress. Proactive communication, particularly between physicians and nurses, was suggested to reduce interruptions.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyPhysiciansTeaching RoundsHumansMedical Staff, HospitalPatient Care

Identifiers

PMID33897961
PMCPMC8054601
OpenAlexW3154325866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.