Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33897851›Full record

ArticleShoulder & elbow2021

The accuracy of computed tomography for clavicle non-union evaluation.

Jamie A Nicholson, B Fox, R Dhir, Ahrw Simpson, C M Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Shoulder & elbow, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jamie A NicholsonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3640-8254
B FoxDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2949-6236
R DhirDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Ahrw SimpsonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
C M RobinsonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe primary aim of this study is to determine the accuracy of CT scanning when evaluating non-union of the clavicle.

methodsA retrospective review was performed of all CT scans undertaken for suspected nonunion of midshaft clavicle fractures over a 10-year period. The influence of scan timing, callus and patient characteristics was evaluated.

resultsOne hundred eighty-four CT scans were analysed. No patient was incorrectly diagnosed with union ( DISCUSSION: CT has excellent accuracy to determine clavicle union but approximately one in five suspected non-unions went onto unite. Hypertrophic callus finding resulted in a delayed union in approximately half of the cases in our study.

Indexed as

ClavicleCTnon-union

Identifiers

PMID33897851
PMCPMC8039767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.