ReviewInterventional cardiology (London, England)2021
Contemporary Management of Isolated Ostial Side Branch Disease: An Evidence-based Approach to Medina 001 Bifurcations.
Review in Interventional cardiology (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Isolated Medina 0,0,1 Ostial Side-Branch Lesions: Procedural Outcomes, Bailout Stenting, and 12-Month Clinical Follow-Up.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Safety Profile of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Isolated Side Branch Lesions: A Single-Center Experience.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2026Article
- Comparison of Different Double-Stent Implantation Techniques on Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Finite Element Analysis.Current cardiology reviews · 2026Article
- From association to causation: Integrating stable, subgroup-aware SHAP explanations with causal inference for trustworthy AI in coronary bifurcation PCI.ARYA atherosclerosis · 2026Article
- Double-Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Coronary Bifurcations: A 1-Year Follow-up Study in Vietnam.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Kissing Balloon-Stent Technique for Simple Bifurcation Lesions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Percutaneous coronary intervention involving coronary bifurcation is associated with higher mortality and complications.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2024Article
- Reply to Letter to the Editor: 'Single-Stent Double-Kissing Nano-Crush Technique for the Management of Side Branch Ostial Lesions: A Game Changer? Or Just Another Player in the Game?'Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2023Article
- Reply to Letter to the Editor: 'Pros and Cons of a Novel Coronary Stenting Technique for Medina 0.0.1 Lesions: Osdokina Crush'.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2023Article
- One-Stent Double-Kissing Nano Crush- Osdokina Crush-Technique Could be a Game- Changer in the Treatment of Medina 0.0.1 Lesion.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2023Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation Lesions According to Medina Classification.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The optimal management of bifurcation lesions has received significant interest in recent years and remains a matter of debate among the interventional cardiology community. Bifurcation lesions are encountered in approximately 21% of percutaneous coronary intervention procedures and are associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiac events. The Medina classification has been developed in an attempt to standardise the terminology when describing bifurcation lesions. The focus of this article is on the management of the Medina 0,0,1 lesion ('Medina 001'), an uncommon lesion encountered in <5% of all bifurcations. Technical considerations, management options and interventional techniques relating to the Medina 001 lesion are discussed. In addition, current published data supporting the various proposed interventional treatment strategies are examined in an attempt to delineate an evidence-based approach to this uncommon lesion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.