ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2021
Prevention of uterine perforation during intracavitary brachytherapy of cervical cancer.
Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Three-dimensional trans-rectal and trans-abdominal ultrasound image fusion for the guidance of gynecologic brachytherapy procedures: a proof of concept study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Integration of Ultrasound in Image-Guided Adaptive Brachytherapy in Cancer of the Uterine Cervix.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- An audit of uterine perforation and its effect on the final outcome in an academic research medical center: An optimized balance between overall treatment time and medical crisis.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2023Article
- Applicator for cervical brachytherapy for MRI or CT guided therapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIntracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) is a part of standard treatment for loco-regionally advanced cervical cancers. ICBT requires a tandem applicator insertion through cervical canal into uterine cavity. Accurate placement through cervical canal, which is distorted by cancer, is crucial to successful treatment. The objective of this study was to investigate actual complication rate of a Smit sleeve insertion performed by experienced gynecologists in a tertiary referral center. MATERIAL AND
methodsClinical data of 328 patients with cervical cancer treated using ICBT, between January 2013 and August 2019, were retrospectively evaluated. Predisposing factors that could have increased the risk of uterine perforation were recorded. Pre-operative ultrasound was carried out for visualization of uterine curvature and selection of an appropriate Smith sleeve length. All applications were performed by a gynecologic oncology fellow or an expert gynecologist.
results317 patients were suitable for analysis. Only one (0.3%) applicator placement resulted in uterine perforation. In two patients, Smit sleeve dislocated after first brachytherapy and reinserted. Adequate applicator placement was achieved, and treatment was completed as planned in 316 cases.
conclusionsA cervical sleeve technic, which reduced the need for multiple insertions and placement of this instrument by an expert gynecologist minimize the risk of complication relative to historical controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.