Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33897651›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2021

Microbiome Sample Comparison and Search: From Pair-Wise Calculations to Model-Based Matching.

Yuguo Zha, Hui Chong, Kang Ning

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Microbial Dark Matter: from Discovery to Applications.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuguo ZhaKey Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of the Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Molecular-Imaging, Department of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Center of AI Biology, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Hui ChongKey Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of the Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Molecular-Imaging, Department of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Center of AI Biology, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Kang NingKey Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of the Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Molecular-Imaging, Department of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Center of AI Biology, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A huge quantity of microbiome samples have been accumulated, and more are yet to come from all niches around the globe. With the accumulation of data, there is an urgent need for comparisons and searches of microbiome samples among thousands of millions of samples in a fast and accurate manner. However, it is a very difficult computational challenge to identify similar samples, as well as identify their likely origins, among such a grand pool of samples from all around the world. Currently, several approaches have already been proposed for such a challenge, based on either distance calculation, unsupervised algorithms, or supervised algorithms. These methods have advantages and disadvantages for the different settings of comparisons and searches, and their results are also drastically different. In this review, we systematically compared distance-based, unsupervised, and supervised methods for microbiome sample comparison and search. Firstly, we assessed their accuracy and efficiency, both in theory and in practice. Then we described the scenarios in which one or multiple methods were applicable for sample searches. Thirdly, we provided several applications for microbiome sample comparisons and searches, and provided suggestions on the choice of methods. Finally, we provided several perspectives for the future development of microbiome sample comparison and search, including deep learning technologies for tracking the sources of microbiome samples.

Indexed as

comparisondistance-basedmicrobiomesearchsupervisedunsupervised

Identifiers

PMID33897651
PMCPMC8059704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.