Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33897488›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2021

Looking Back to Move Forward: Reflections on the Strengths and Challenges of the COVID-19 UK Mental Health Research Response.

Ola Demkowicz, Margarita Panayiotou, Sam Parsons, Amy Feltham, Louise Arseneault, Beth Ingram, Praveetha Patalay, Dawn Edge, Matthias Pierce, Cathy Creswell and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ola DemkowiczManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Margarita PanayiotouManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Sam ParsonsDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Amy FelthamIndependent Researcher, London, United Kingdom.
Louise ArseneaultKing's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.
Beth IngramHearts and Minds, London, United Kingdom.
Praveetha PatalayCentre for Longitudinal Studies and Medical Research Council Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Dawn EdgeDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Matthias PierceDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Cathy CreswellDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Christina VictorCollege of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, London, United Kingdom.
Rory C O'ConnorInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Pamela QualterManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
University of Manchester · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBBrunel University of London · GBKing's College London · GBMedical Research Council · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, the swift response of mental health research funders and institutions, service providers, and academics enabled progress toward understanding the mental health consequences. Nevertheless, there remains an urgent need to understand the true extent of the short- and long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health, necessitating ongoing research. Although the speed with which mental health researchers have mobilized to respond to the pandemic so far is to be commended, there are valid concerns as to whether speed may have compromised the quality of our work. As the pandemic continues to evolve, we must take time to reflect on our initial research response and collectively consider how we can use this to strengthen ensuing COVID-19 mental health research and our response to future crises. Here, we offer our reflections as members of the UK mental health research community to discuss the continuing progress and persisting challenges of our COVID-19 response, which we hope can encourage reflection and discussion among the wider research community. We conclude that (1) Fragmentation in our infrastructure has challenged the efficient, effective and equitable deployment of resources, (2) In responding quickly, we may have overlooked the role of experts by experience, (3) Robust and open methods may have been compromised by speedy responses, and (4) This pandemic may exacerbate existing issues of inequality in our workforce.

Indexed as

coproductionCOVID-19 pandemicmental health researchopen sciencerobust methodsworkforce inequality

Identifiers

PMID33897488
PMCPMC8060503
OpenAlexW3138182209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.