Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33897441›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2021

Levofloxacin Versus Ciprofloxacin in the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections: Evidence-Based Analysis.

Dehong Cao, Yinzhi Shen, Yin Huang, Bo Chen, Zeyu Chen, Jianzhong Ai, Liangren Liu, Lu Yang, Qiang Wei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Therapeutic strategies for multi-resistantJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Therapeutic Interventions forJournal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dehong CaoDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yinzhi ShenWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yin HuangDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Bo ChenDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zeyu ChenDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jianzhong AiDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Liangren LiuDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Lu YangDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Qiang WeiDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most common bacterial infections acquired both in community and hospital. Fluoroquinolones, represented by levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin, are widely used for treatment of UTIs. However, it remains controversial for the comparison between the 2 drugs, which propelled us to conduct the first evidence-based research on this topic. To establish their relative efficacy and safety, we searched Pubmed, embase, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for UTIs. A total of 5 RCTs were finally included, involving 2,352 patients and a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to compare the end-of-therapy and posttherapy clinical success rate, microbial eradication rate and adverse event rate. Jadad score and Review Manager 5.3.0 version were applied respectively to evaluate the study quality and heterogeneity. There was no significant difference between levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin group in end-of-therapy or posttherapy clinical success rate and microbial eradication rate (

Indexed as

ciprofloxacinefficacyfluoroquinolonelevofloxacinsafetyurinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID33897441
PMCPMC8060646
OpenAlexW3154237716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.