Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33897359›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021

Multisensory Integration in Stroke Patients: A Theoretical Approach to Reinterpret Upper-Limb Proprioceptive Deficits and Visual Compensation.

Jules Bernard-Espina, Mathieu Beraneck, Marc A Maier, Michele Tagliabue

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06956183 (The Effect of Vestibular Exercise Program on Fatigue, Balance and Gait in Patients With Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06956183 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Vestibular Exercise Program on Fatigue, Balance and Gait in Patients With Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorHacettepe UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsStrokeArmsControl (Standard treatment), Vestibular exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Perceptual-Cognitive Integration for Goal-Directed Action in Naturalistic Environments.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jules Bernard-EspinaUniversité de Paris, INCC UMR 8002, CNRS, Paris, France.
Mathieu BeraneckUniversité de Paris, INCC UMR 8002, CNRS, Paris, France.
Marc A MaierUniversité de Paris, INCC UMR 8002, CNRS, Paris, France.
Michele TagliabueUniversité de Paris, INCC UMR 8002, CNRS, Paris, France.
Université Paris Cité · FRCentre Neurosciences intégratives et CognitionInstitut de Neurosciences Cognitives et Intégratives d’Aquitaine · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For reaching and grasping, as well as for manipulating objects, optimal hand motor control arises from the integration of multiple sources of sensory information, such as proprioception and vision. For this reason, proprioceptive deficits often observed in stroke patients have a significant impact on the integrity of motor functions. The present targeted review attempts to reanalyze previous findings about proprioceptive upper-limb deficits in stroke patients, as well as their ability to compensate for these deficits using vision. Our theoretical approach is based on two concepts: first, the description of multi-sensory integration using statistical optimization models; second, on the insight that sensory information is not only encoded in the reference frame of origin (e.g., retinal and joint space for vision and proprioception, respectively), but also in higher-order sensory spaces. Combining these two concepts within a single framework appears to account for the heterogeneity of experimental findings reported in the literature. The present analysis suggests that functional upper limb post-stroke deficits could not only be due to an impairment of the proprioceptive system per se, but also due to deficiencies of cross-references processing; that is of the ability to encode proprioceptive information in a non-joint space. The distinction between purely proprioceptive or cross-reference-related deficits can account for two experimental observations: first, one and the same patient can perform differently depending on specific proprioceptive assessments; and a given behavioral assessment results in large variability across patients. The distinction between sensory and cross-reference deficits is also supported by a targeted literature review on the relation between cerebral structure and proprioceptive function. This theoretical framework has the potential to lead to a new stratification of patients with proprioceptive deficits, and may offer a novel approach to post-stroke rehabilitation.

Indexed as

eye-hand coordinationmaximum likelihood principlemultisensory integrationproprioception assessmentstrokevisual compensation

Identifiers

PMID33897359
PMCPMC8058201
OpenAlexW3147388450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.