Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33897241›Full record

ArticlePhysics of fluids (Woodbury, N.Y. : 1994)2021

Computer simulation of the SARS-CoV-2 contamination risk in a large dental clinic.

Jonathan Komperda, Ahmad Peyvan, Dongru Li, Babak Kashir, Alexander L Yarin, Constantine M Megaridis, Parisa Mirbod, Igor Paprotny, Lyndon F Cooper, Susan Rowan and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics of fluids (Woodbury, N.Y. : 1994), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Quantifying strategies to minimize aerosol dispersion in dental clinics.Experimental and computational multiphase flow · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Effect of recirculation zones on the ventilation of a public washroom.Physics of fluids (Woodbury, N.Y. : 1994) · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan KomperdaDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60607, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8962-1828
Ahmad PeyvanDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60607, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4038-3432
Dongru LiDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60607, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5596-4374
Babak KashirDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60607, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9272-6711
Alexander L YarinDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60607, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8032-2525
Constantine M MegaridisDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60607, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6339-6933
Parisa MirbodDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60607, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2627-1971
Igor PaprotnyDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60607, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8147-8687
Lyndon F CooperCollege of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6577-781X
Susan RowanCollege of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.
Clark StanfordCollege of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5449-1210
Farzad MashayekDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60607, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1187-4937
University of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) virus, has been rapidly spreading worldwide since December 2019, causing a public health crisis. Recent studies showed SARS-CoV-2's ability to infect humans via airborne routes. These motivated the study of aerosol and airborne droplet transmission in a variety of settings. This study performs a large-scale numerical simulation of a real-world dentistry clinic that contains aerosol-generating procedures. The simulation tracks the dispersion of evaporating droplets emitted during ultrasonic dental scaling procedures. The simulation considers 25 patient treatment cubicles in an open plan dentistry clinic. The droplets are modeled as having a volatile (evaporating) and nonvolatile fraction composed of virions, saliva, and impurities from the irrigant water supply. The simulated clinic's boundary and flow conditions are validated against experimental measurements of the real clinic. The results evaluate the behavior of large droplets and aerosols. We investigate droplet residence time and travel distance for different droplet diameters, surface contamination due to droplet settling and deposition, airborne aerosol mass concentration, and the quantity of droplets that escape through ventilation. The simulation results raise concerns due to the aerosols' long residence times (averaging up to 7.31 min) and travel distances (averaging up to 24.45 m) that exceed social distancing guidelines. Finally, the results show that contamination extends beyond the immediate patient treatment areas, requiring additional surface disinfection in the clinic. The results presented in this research may be used to establish safer dental clinic operating procedures, especially if paired with future supplementary material concerning the aerosol viral load generated by ultrasonic scaling and the viral load thresholds required to infect humans.

Identifiers

PMID33897241
PMCPMC8060974
OpenAlexW3149034889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.