ArticleNational journal of maxillofacial surgery
Histological evaluation of two different anorganic bovine bone matrixes in lateral wall sinus elevation procedure: A retrospective study.
Article in National journal of maxillofacial surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Histomorphometric and Micro-CT Evaluation of Cerabone and Bio-Oss in Maxillary Sinus Lifting: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Trial
- Enhancing Bone Repair: Impact of Raloxifene-Functionalized CeraboneJournal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Regeneration of Critical Calvarial Bone Defects Using Bovine Xenograft, Magnesium-Enriched Bovine Xenograft and Autologous Dentin in Rats: Micro-CT, Gene Expression and Immunohistochemical Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- A comparative analysis of particulate bovine bone substitutes for oral regeneration: a narrative review.International journal of implant dentistry · 2024Review
- First Clinical Case Report of a Xenograft-Allograft Combination for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Using a Bovine Bone Substitute Material with Hyaluronate (CeraboneJournal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- A randomised trial of the bone formation after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite (Cerabone®) and Photobiomodulation: histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analysis.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2023Article
- Osseointegration at Implants Installed in Composite Bone: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Sinus Floor Elevation.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Article
- Comparison of Injectable Biphasic Calcium Phosphate and a Bovine Xenograft in Socket Preservation: Qualitative and Quantitative Histologic Study in Humans.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Assessment of the Bone Healing Process Mediated by Periosteum-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells' Secretome and a Xenogenic Bioceramic-An In Vivo Study in the Rabbit Critical Size Calvarial Defect Model.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Evaluation of bone maturation following application of treated tooth bio-graft in bone defects: Experimental animal study.National journal of maxillofacial surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGrafting in oral implantology involves bone augmentation procedures with various bone graft materials. Success of such procedures is evaluated through the amount of bone volume and bone formed at the grafted site. The primary aim of this prospective study was to histomorphometrically evaluate and compare the new bone formation with Bio Oss or Cerabone in the lateral approach sinus augmentation procedure. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe research targeted 22 patients who were either partially or completely edentulous posterior maxilla with residual alveolar height 3 mm at the site of implantation and underwent a two staged surgical protocol, with a lateral approach sinus grafting with either Bio Oss or Cerabone. Bone trephine biopsies for histological analysis were harvested 6 months after augmentation while preparing the osteotomies for implant placement trephine. The histologic evaluation was performed comparing the newly formed bone, marrow spaces, biomaterial particles remnants, and presence of osteocytes embedded in both trabecular bone and bone tissue near the anorganic bovine bone.
resultsThe present study showed that neither of the graft material showed any active osteoclasts and host inflammatory reaction. From sites grafted with Cerabone, an ample amount of mature lamellated bone formation was seen, also host inflammatory response was indicative of minimal reactive inflammatory response suggestive of good acceptability of the graft material by the host. No significant differences between the groups could be detected with regard to new bone formation and residual bone substitute.
conclusionThe results of the study illustrates that both the bone substitute materials allow predictable new bone formation in sinus augmentation procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.