Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33897106›Full record

ArticleSafety science2021

Linking healthcare and societal resilience during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Gianluca Pescaroli, Luca Galbusera, Monica Cardarilli, Georgios Giannopoulos, David Alexander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Safety science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Factors affecting worriedness: A study of the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan.International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR · 2022
    Article
  7. People's Perception of Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study in Japan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. COVID-19 vaccine distribution planning using a congested queuing system-A real case from Australia.Transportation research. Part E, Logistics and transportation review · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gianluca PescaroliInstitute for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Luca GalbuseraEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Monica CardarilliEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Georgios GiannopoulosEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
David AlexanderInstitute for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) has highlighted the link between public healthcare and the broader context of operational response to complex crises. Data are needed to support the work of the emergency services and enhance governance. This study develops a Europe-wide analysis of perceptions, needs and priorities of the public affected by the Covid-19 emergency. An online multilingual survey was conducted from mid-May until mid-July 2020. The questionnaire investigates perceptions of public healthcare, emergency management and societal resilience. In total, N = 3029 valid answers were collected. They were analysed both as a whole and focusing on the most represented countries (Italy, Romania, Spain and the United Kingdom). Our findings highlight some perceived weaknesses in emergency management that are associated with the underlying vulnerability of the global interconnected society and public healthcare systems. The spreading of the epidemic in Italy represented a 'tipping point' for perceiving Covid-19 as an 'emergency' in the surveyed countries. The respondents uniformly suggested a preference for gradually restarting activities. We observed a tendency to ignore the cascading effects of Covid-19 and possible concurrence of threats. Our study highlights the need for practices designed to address the next phases of the Covid-19 crisis and prepare for future systemic shocks. Cascading effects that could compromise operational capacity need to be considered more carefully. We make the case for the reinforcement of cross-border coordination of public health initiatives, for standardization in business continuity management, and for dealing with the recovery at the European level.

Identifiers

PMID33897106
PMCPMC8054640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.