Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33897093›Full record

ArticleBuilding and environment2020

Morphology and quantification of fungal growth in residential dust and carpets.

Nicholas Nastasi, Sarah R Haines, Lingyi Xu, Hadler da Silva, Adnan Divjan, Mark A Barnes, Chad A Rappleye, Matthew S Perzanowski, Brett J Green, Karen C Dannemiller

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Building and environment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Indoor Microbiome: Sampling, Analysis and Emerging Trends.Environmental microbiology reports · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas NastasiDepartment of Civil, Environmental, and Geodetic Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Sarah R HainesDepartment of Civil, Environmental, and Geodetic Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Lingyi XuDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Hadler da SilvaDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Adnan DivjanDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Mark A BarnesAllergy and Clinical Immunology Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Chad A RappleyeDepartment of Microbiology, College of Arts and Sciences, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Matthew S PerzanowskiDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Brett J GreenAllergy and Clinical Immunology Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Karen C DannemillerDepartment of Civil, Environmental, and Geodetic Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Columbia University · USThe Ohio State University · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USFlorida State University · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mold growth indoors is associated with negative human health effects, and this growth is limited by moisture availability. Dust deposited in carpet is an important source of human exposure due to potential elevated resuspension compared to hard floors. However, we need an improved understanding of fungal growth in dust and carpet to better estimate human exposure. The goal of this study was to compare fungal growth quantity and morphology in residential carpet under different environmental conditions, including equilibrium relative humidity (ERH) (50%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 100%), carpet fiber material (nylon, olefin, wool) and presence/absence of dust. We analyzed incubated carpet and dust samples from three Ohio homes for total fungal DNA, fungal allergen Alt a 1, and fungal morphology. Dust presence and elevated ERH (≥85%) were the most important variables that increased fungal growth. Elevated ERH increased mean fungal DNA concentration (P < 0.0001), for instance by approximately 1000 times at 100% compared to 50% ERH after two weeks. Microscopy also revealed more fungal growth at higher ERH. Fungal concentrations were up to 100 times higher in samples containing house dust compared to no dust. For fiber type, olefin had the least total fungal growth, and nylon had the most total fungi and

Indexed as

FlooringFungiIndoor air qualityMicroscopyMoistureMold

Identifiers

PMID33897093
PMCPMC8064739
OpenAlexW3006805646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.