Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33897012›Full record

ArticleJournal of food science and technology2021

Optimization of wheat dextrin yogurt formulation using response surface methodology.

Nazni Peerkhan, Sandra Nair

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nazni PeerkhanDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Periyar University, Salem, Tamil Nadu 636011 India.ORCID 0000-0002-3081-8407
Sandra NairDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Periyar University, Salem, Tamil Nadu 636011 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the current study, response surface methodology was executed to optimize the ingredient formulation and process conditions production such as wheat dextrin, starter culture and incubation time on the responses such as pH, viscosity, syneresis, overall acceptability, L* value and hardness of the wheat dextrin yogurt. The analyses showed that the wheat dextrin yogurts have a pH from 4.09 to 4.98, viscosity from 10,649.5 to 21,410.1 cP, syneresis from 2 to 26.67%, overall acceptability from 5.3 to 7.9, L* value from 81.2 to 84.3 and hardness from 506 to 5943.3 g during the optimization process. From the variance analysis, the R

Indexed as

Dietary fiberResponse surface methodologyWheat dextrinYogurt

Identifiers

PMID33897012
PMCPMC8021652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.