Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33896783›Full record

ArticleSaudi medical journal2021

Assessment of disaster preparedness at general hospitals in Al-Madinah Al-Munawarah Province, Western Region of Saudi Arabia: A study of pre intervention and post intervention test scores from 2017 to 2019.

Anas Khan, Jalal Alowais, Abdullah Nofal, Tareef Alama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anas KhanFrom the Department of Emergency Medicine (Khan), College of Medicine, King Saud University; from the Department of Surgery (Alowais), College of Medicine, Imam Muhammad ibn Saud Islamic University; from the Disaster Management Unit (Nofal), King Saud University Medical City; and from the Ministry of Health (Alama), Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Jalal AlowaisFrom the Department of Emergency Medicine (Khan), College of Medicine, King Saud University; from the Department of Surgery (Alowais), College of Medicine, Imam Muhammad ibn Saud Islamic University; from the Disaster Management Unit (Nofal), King Saud University Medical City; and from the Ministry of Health (Alama), Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah NofalFrom the Department of Emergency Medicine (Khan), College of Medicine, King Saud University; from the Department of Surgery (Alowais), College of Medicine, Imam Muhammad ibn Saud Islamic University; from the Disaster Management Unit (Nofal), King Saud University Medical City; and from the Ministry of Health (Alama), Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Tareef AlamaFrom the Department of Emergency Medicine (Khan), College of Medicine, King Saud University; from the Department of Surgery (Alowais), College of Medicine, Imam Muhammad ibn Saud Islamic University; from the Disaster Management Unit (Nofal), King Saud University Medical City; and from the Ministry of Health (Alama), Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the Ministry of Health (MoH) hospitals preparedness for potential disasters and crisis events using the World Health Organization (WHO) hospital emergency response checklist.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at MoH hospitals in Al-Madina, Saudi Arabia using the WHO hospital emergency response checklist. The overall level of hospital preparedness was categorized as unacceptable if the rating is between 0-64, insufficient if it is between 65-129 and effective preparedness if the score is between 130-184. The study conducted in 3 phases. First phase, the preintervention assessment was conducted from August 23 to 27, 2017. Second phase, intervention strategies were implemented between 2018 and 2019 to enhance the hospitals preparedness for any potential disaster situation. Third phase, the postintervention assessment was conducted from September 5 to 7, 2019, using with the same checklist.

resultsThe preparedness score of key components at the participating hospitals showed an "insufficient" level of preparedness. The mean preparedness score of the participating hospitals was 81.5±11.39 (range: 65-91), which is lower than the recommended WHO cut-off level of effective preparedness. The preparedness score of the post-recovery component was very low 01±1.15 compared to the WHO range (0-18).

conclusionA total of 4 hospitals participated in the study. The participated hospitals showed insufficient levels of preparedness for potential disasters and crisis events.

Indexed as

Disaster PlanningDisastersCross-Sectional StudiesHospitals, GeneralHumansSaudi ArabiadisasterMadinahpreparedness mass gatheringSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID33896783
PMCPMC9149693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.