Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33895972›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2021

Toxic proteins application in cancer therapy.

Zahra Setayesh-Mehr, Mahdiye Poorsargol

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zahra Setayesh-MehrDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran. setayeshmehr@uoz.ac.ir.
Mahdiye PoorsargolDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran.
Zabol University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ribosome inactivating proteins (RIPs) as family of anti-cancer drugs recently received much attention due to their interesting anti-cancer mechanism. In spite of small drugs, RIPs use the large-size effect (LSE) to prevent the efflux process governed by drug resistance transporters (DRTs) which prevents inside of the cells against drug transfection. There are many clinical translation obstacles that severely restrict their applications especially their delivery approach to the tumor cells. As the main goal of this review, we will focus on trichosanthin (TCS) and gelonin (Gel) and other types, especially scorpion venom-derived RIPs to clarify that they are struggling with what types of bio-barriers and these challenges could be solved in cancer therapy science. Then, we will try to highlight recent state-of-the-arts in delivery of RIPs for cancer therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicHumansNeoplasmsRibosome Inactivating Proteins, Type 1Scorpion VenomsSodium Channel BlockersTrichosanthinAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicGEL protein, Gelonium multiflorumRibosome Inactivating Proteins, Type 1Scorpion VenomsSodium Channel BlockersTrichosanthinCancerCytotoxicityDrug deliveryProteinsScorpion venomTumor

Identifiers

PMID33895972
OpenAlexW3158024280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.