Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33895887›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2021

Digital imaging for reading of direct rapid antibiotic susceptibility tests from positive blood cultures.

Gina K Thomson, Kira Jamros, James W Snyder, Kenneth S Thomson

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Optimizing bloodstream infection diagnosis: Implementation of the EUCAST Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (RAST) with automated digital imaging.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gina K ThomsonMicrobiology Department, University of Louisville Hospital, 530 South Jackson St, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA. gina.thomson@uoflhealth.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2525-3317
Kira JamrosMicrobiology Department, University of Louisville Hospital, 530 South Jackson St, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
James W SnyderDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4824-762X
Kenneth S ThomsonDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7542-2019
University of Louisville · USUniversity of Louisville Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delaying effective antibiotic therapy is a major cause of sepsis-associated mortality. The EUCAST rapid antibiotic susceptibility test (RAST) is performed from positive blood cultures to provide rapid results. Disc diffusion tests inoculated with positive blood culture broth are read at 4, 6, and 8 h and interpreted against species and time-specific criteria. Potential problems are the possibility of missing specific reading times for tests and slower growth in incubators that are frequently opened. The current study aimed to assess if digital visualization by the BD Kiestra™ total laboratory automation system is suitable for reading RASTs by capturing images at the correct times and retaining them for review. Utilizing the Kiestra™ InoqulA, 100 μl of positive blood culture broth was lawn-inoculated onto Mueller-Hinton agar and incubated at 35 °C for automated digital zone measurement at 4, 6, and 8 h. Aliquots from 135 positive blood cultures were tested against EUCAST-recommended and other drugs and assessed for readability of digital images. Microdilution MICs were determined in parallel to RASTs. All isolates except 7/10 enterococci yielded images of suitable quality for zone measurement. Of the 641 digitally read tests for other organisms, 207 (32.3%) were readable in 4 h, 555 (86.6%) in 6 h, and 641 (100%) in 8 h. For tests included in EUCAST criteria, 92.1% provided categorical agreement with microdilution MICs. Digital image reading of RASTs is a potentially viable, inexpensive tool for providing rapid susceptibility results which can help reduce sepsis-associated mortality.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAutomationBacteriaBacterial InfectionsBlood CultureComputersHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBlood cultureDirect susceptibilityKiestraRASTSepsis

Identifiers

PMID33895887
OpenAlexW3159249368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.