ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2021
Digital imaging for reading of direct rapid antibiotic susceptibility tests from positive blood cultures.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Five Assays for Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (RAST), Including Disk Diffusion, MIC-Based Systems, and Genotypic Methods: A Prospective Evaluation.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Article
- Optimizing bloodstream infection diagnosis: Implementation of the EUCAST Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (RAST) with automated digital imaging.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Article
- Development and evaluation of a direct disk diffusion, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing method from blood culture positive for Gram-negative bacilli using rapid molecular testing and microbiology laboratory automation.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- The Use of Machine Learning for Image Analysis Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Microbiology.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Delaying effective antibiotic therapy is a major cause of sepsis-associated mortality. The EUCAST rapid antibiotic susceptibility test (RAST) is performed from positive blood cultures to provide rapid results. Disc diffusion tests inoculated with positive blood culture broth are read at 4, 6, and 8 h and interpreted against species and time-specific criteria. Potential problems are the possibility of missing specific reading times for tests and slower growth in incubators that are frequently opened. The current study aimed to assess if digital visualization by the BD Kiestra™ total laboratory automation system is suitable for reading RASTs by capturing images at the correct times and retaining them for review. Utilizing the Kiestra™ InoqulA, 100 μl of positive blood culture broth was lawn-inoculated onto Mueller-Hinton agar and incubated at 35 °C for automated digital zone measurement at 4, 6, and 8 h. Aliquots from 135 positive blood cultures were tested against EUCAST-recommended and other drugs and assessed for readability of digital images. Microdilution MICs were determined in parallel to RASTs. All isolates except 7/10 enterococci yielded images of suitable quality for zone measurement. Of the 641 digitally read tests for other organisms, 207 (32.3%) were readable in 4 h, 555 (86.6%) in 6 h, and 641 (100%) in 8 h. For tests included in EUCAST criteria, 92.1% provided categorical agreement with microdilution MICs. Digital image reading of RASTs is a potentially viable, inexpensive tool for providing rapid susceptibility results which can help reduce sepsis-associated mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.