Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33895868›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2022

Attitudes towards disclosing a mental illness: impact on quality of life and recovery.

Lea Mayer, Patrick W Corrigan, Daniela Eisheuer, Nathalie Oexle, Nicolas Rüsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Internalized Stigma and Help-Seeking Across Problems and Targets.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Stigma Toward Severe Mental Illness Among Healthcare Students: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lea MayerSection of Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry II, University of Ulm and BKH Günzburg, Parkstr. 11, Ulm, Germany. lea.mayer@uni-ulm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1420-6152
Patrick W CorriganDepartment of Psychology, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, USA.
Daniela EisheuerSection of Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry II, University of Ulm and BKH Günzburg, Parkstr. 11, Ulm, Germany.
Nathalie OexleSection of Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry II, University of Ulm and BKH Günzburg, Parkstr. 11, Ulm, Germany.
Nicolas RüschSection of Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry II, University of Ulm and BKH Günzburg, Parkstr. 11, Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe decision whether to disclose a mental illness has individual and social consequences. Secrecy may protect from stigma and discrimination while disclosure can increase social support and facilitate help-seeking. Therefore, disclosure decisions are a key reaction to stigma. The first aim of this study was to test a newly developed scale to measure disclosure attitudes, the Attitudes to Disclosure Questionnaire (AtDQ). The second aim was to examine the impact of attitudes towards disclosing a mental illness on quality of life and recovery.

methodsAmong 100 participants with mental illness, disclosure attitudes, quality of life, recovery, benefits of disclosure, secrecy, social withdrawal, self-stigma, and depressive symptoms were assessed at weeks 0, 3 and 6. Psychometric properties of the AtDQ were analysed. Longitudinal associations between disclosure attitudes at baseline and quality of life and recovery after 6 weeks were examined in linear regressions.

resultsThe analyses of the AtDQ indicated one-factor solutions, high acceptability, high internal consistency, and good retest reliability for the total scale and the subscales as well as high construct validity of the total scale. Results provided initial support for sensitivity to change. More positive disclosure attitudes in general and in particular regarding to family at baseline predicted better quality of life and recovery after 6 weeks.

conclusionThe current study provides initial support for the AtDQ as a useful measure of disclosure attitudes. Disclosing a mental illness, especially with respect to family, may improve quality of life and recovery of people with mental illness.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersQuality of LifeAttitudeHumansReproducibility of ResultsSocial StigmaAttitudes to disclosure questionnaireDisclosure attitudesMental illness stigmaQuality of lifeRecovery

Identifiers

PMID33895868
PMCPMC8784363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.