Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33895856›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2021

Low technology, mild controlled hypothermia for necrotizing enterocolitis treatment: an initiative to improve healthcare to preterm neonates.

Walusa Assad Gonçalves-Ferri, Cristina Helena Faleiros Ferreira, Laryssa de Carli de Almeida Couto, Thaissa Rodrigues Souza, Thayane de Castro Peres, Fabio Carmona, Davi Casale Aragon, Gerson Crott, Marisa M Mussi-Pinhata, Jose Simon Camelo Junior and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Walusa Assad Gonçalves-FerriDepartment of Pediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Bandeirantes Avenue 3900, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo state, Brazil. walusa@fmrp.usp.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7174-0044
Cristina Helena Faleiros FerreiraDepartment of Pediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Bandeirantes Avenue 3900, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo state, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6308-1766
Laryssa de Carli de Almeida CoutoDepartment of Surgery. Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Thaissa Rodrigues SouzaDepartment of Pediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Bandeirantes Avenue 3900, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo state, Brazil.
Thayane de Castro PeresDepartment of Pediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Bandeirantes Avenue 3900, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo state, Brazil.
Fabio CarmonaDepartment of Pediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Bandeirantes Avenue 3900, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo state, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5743-0325
Davi Casale AragonDepartment of Pediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Bandeirantes Avenue 3900, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo state, Brazil.
Gerson CrottDepartment of Pediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Bandeirantes Avenue 3900, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo state, Brazil.
Marisa M Mussi-PinhataDepartment of Pediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Bandeirantes Avenue 3900, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo state, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8985-1570
Jose Simon Camelo JuniorDepartment of Pediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Bandeirantes Avenue 3900, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo state, Brazil.
Anelise RooschDepartment of Pediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Bandeirantes Avenue 3900, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo state, Brazil.
Lourenço Sbragia NetoDepartment of Surgery. Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) treatment remains unchanged for years. Data suggest that mild controlled hypothermia could potentially improve NEC outcomes. Our units presented unfavourable outcomes on NEC. The aim was to assess our experience with low technology, mild controlled hypothermia on NEC outcomes, and improve preterm infants' healthcare. This was a single-center quality improvement study with retrospective cohort design at the neonatal intensive care unit in the university hospital. Forty-three preterm infants with NEC (Modified Bell's Stage II/III) were included: 19 in the control group (2015-2018) and 24 in the hypothermia group (2018-2020). The control group received standard treatment (fasting, abdominal decompression, and broad-spectrum antibiotics). The hypothermia group underwent cooling to 35.5 °C for 48 h after NEC diagnosis, along with conventional treatment. The primary outcomes are intestinal perforation, need for surgery, duration of parenteral nutrition, death, and extensive resection of the small intestine. There was no statistical difference in the NEC score. The hypothermia group required less surgery (aRR 0.40; 95% CI 0.19-0.85), presented less bowel perforation (aRR 0.39; 95% CI 0.18; 0.83), had a shorter duration of parenteral nutrition (aHR 5.28; 95% CI 1.88-14.89), did not need extensive intestinal resection, (0 vs 15.7%), and did not experience any deaths (0 vs 31.6%).Conclusions: In our experience, low technology, mild controlled hypothermia was feasible, not related to adverse effects, and effective treatment for NEC Modified Bell's Stage II/III. It avoided surgery, bowel perforation, and extensive intestinal resection; reduced mortality; and shortened parenteral nutrition duration. What is Known: • New approaches have been proposed to avoid enterocolitis incidence; however, the treatment of enterocolitis stage 2 has been the same for decades, and unfavourable outcomes remain despite conventional management. • Studies suggest that hypothermia can be an alternative to enterocolitis treatment. What is New: • Mild controlled hypothermia can be an additional practice to treat enterocolitis stage 2, is feasible, and is not related to adverse effects to preterm infants. • It can decrease surgery needs, duration of parenteral nutrition, and death and avoids extensive intestinal resection in preterm infants.

Indexed as

Enterocolitis, NecrotizingHypothermia, InducedDelivery of Health CareHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureRetrospective StudiesTechnologyHypothermiaNecrotizing enterocolitisPreterm infantSmall intestine

Identifiers

PMID33895856
OpenAlexW3158180122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.