Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33895820›Full record

ArticleThe Plant cell2021

Endosperm-based incompatibilities in hybrid monkeyflowers.

Taliesin J Kinser, Ronald D Smith, Amelia H Lawrence, Arielle M Cooley, Mario Vallejo-Marín, Gregory D Conradi Smith, Joshua R Puzey

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant cell, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genetic and environmental manipulation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Taliesin J KinserBiology Department, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23185.ORCID 0000-0002-9497-5399
Ronald D SmithDepartment of Applied Science, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23185.ORCID 0000-0003-2736-0092
Amelia H LawrenceBiology Department, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23185.ORCID 0000-0001-7467-7338
Arielle M CooleyBiology Department, Whitman College, Walla Walla, Washington 99362.ORCID 0000-0003-3730-0288
Mario Vallejo-MarínBiological and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland FK9 4LA, UK.
Gregory D Conradi SmithDepartment of Applied Science, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23185.
Joshua R PuzeyBiology Department, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23185.ORCID 0000-0001-8019-9993
William & Mary · USUniversity of Stirling · GBWhitman College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endosperm is an angiosperm innovation central to their reproduction whose development, and thus seed viability, is controlled by genomic imprinting, where expression from certain genes is parent-specific. Unsuccessful imprinting has been linked to failed inter-specific and inter-ploidy hybridization. Despite their importance in plant speciation, the underlying mechanisms behind these endosperm-based barriers remain poorly understood. Here, we describe one such barrier between diploid Mimulus guttatus and tetraploid Mimulus luteus. The two parents differ in endosperm DNA methylation, expression dynamics, and imprinted genes. Hybrid seeds suffer from underdeveloped endosperm, reducing viability, or arrested endosperm and seed abortion when M. guttatus or M. luteus is seed parent, respectively, and transgressive methylation and expression patterns emerge. The two inherited M. luteus subgenomes, genetically distinct but epigenetically similar, are expressionally dominant over the M. guttatus genome in hybrid embryos and especially their endosperm, where paternal imprints are perturbed. In aborted seeds, de novo methylation is inhibited, potentially owing to incompatible paternal instructions of imbalanced dosage from M. guttatus imprints. We suggest that diverged epigenetic/regulatory landscapes between parental genomes induce epigenetic repatterning and global shifts in expression, which, in endosperm, may uniquely facilitate incompatible interactions between divergent imprinting schemes, potentially driving rapid barriers.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantGenomic ImprintingHybridization, GeneticMimulusSeeds

Identifiers

PMID33895820
PMCPMC8364248
OpenAlexW3158453917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.