Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33895818›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2021

A robust brain signature region approach for episodic memory performance in older adults.

Evan Fletcher, Brandon Gavett, Paul Crane, Anja Soldan, Timothy Hohman, Sarah Farias, Keith Widaman, Colin Groot, Miguel Arce Renteria, Laura Zahodne and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Subjective cognitive complaints and future risk of dementia and cognitive impairment, which matters most.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A novel neuroimaging signature for ADRD risk stratification in the community.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Evan FletcherDepartment of Neurology, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9761-3131
Brandon GavettSchool of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1938-1854
Paul CraneUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Anja SoldanDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Timothy HohmanDepartment of Neurology, Vanderbilt Memory and Alzheimer's Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Sarah FariasDepartment of Neurology, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Keith WidamanGraduate School of Education, UC Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA.
Colin GrootDepartment of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Miguel Arce RenteriaDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Laura ZahodneDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Charles DeCarliDepartment of Neurology, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Dan MungasDepartment of Neurology, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
UC Davis Alzheimer's Disease Core CenterP30AG010129 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI DECARLI, CHARLES · 1991 to 2020
$28.3M
Brain pathologies, reserve and cognition in aging and dementiaR01AG031563 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Evan Fletcher, SARAH E TOMASZEWSKI-FARIAS · 2009 to 2026
$8.9M
The impact of non-amyloid processes on cognitive agingR01AG047827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI DECARLI, CHARLES · 2014 to 2018
$2.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010129NIA NIH HHS R01 AG031563NIA NIH HHS R01 AG047827NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain signature concept aims to characterize brain regions most strongly associated with an outcome of interest. Brain signatures derive their power from data-driven searches that select features based solely on performance metrics of prediction or classification. This approach has important potential to delineate biologically relevant brain substrates for prediction or classification of future trajectories. Recent work has used exploratory voxel-wise or atlas-based searches, with some using machine learning techniques to define salient features. These have shown undoubted usefulness, but two issues remain. The preponderance of recent work has been aimed at categorical rather than continuous outcomes, and it is rare for non-atlas reliant voxel-based signatures to be reported that would be useful for modelling and hypothesis testing. We describe a cross-validated signature region model for structural brain components associated with baseline and longitudinal episodic memory across cognitively heterogeneous populations including normal, mild impairment and dementia. We used three non-overlapping cohorts of older participants: from the UC Davis Aging and Diversity cohort (n = 255; mean age 75.3 ± 7.1 years; 128 cognitively normal, 97 mild cognitive impairment, 30 demented and seven unclassified); from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) 1 (n = 379; mean age 75.1 ± 7.2; 82 cognitively normal, 176 mild cognitive impairment, 121 Alzheimer's dementia); and from ADNI2/GO (n = 680; mean age 72.5 ± 7.1; 220 cognitively normal, 381 mild cognitive impairment and 79 Alzheimer's dementia). We used voxel-wise regression analysis, correcting for multiple comparisons, to generate an array of regional masks corresponding to different association strength levels of cortical grey matter with baseline memory and brain atrophy with memory change. Cognitive measures were episodic memory using Spanish and English Neuropsychological Assessment Scales instruments for UC Davis and ADNI-Mem for ADNI 1 and ADNI2/GO. Performance metric was the adjusted R2 coefficient of determination of each model explaining outcomes in two cohorts other than where it was computed. We compared within-cohort performances of signature models against each other and against other recent signature models of episodic memory. Findings were: (i) two independently generated signature region of interest models performed similarly in a third separate cohort; (ii) a signature region of interest generated in one imaging cohort replicated its performance level when explaining cognitive outcomes in each of other, separate cohorts; and (iii) this approach better explained baseline and longitudinal memory than other recent theory-driven and data-driven models. This suggests our approach can generate signatures that may be easily and robustly applied for modelling and hypothesis testing in mixed cognition cohorts.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationMemory, EpisodicModels, NeurologicalAgedAged, 80 and overBrainCognitive DysfunctionDementiaFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingbrain signaturecross-validationepisodic memorygrey matter densitylongitudinal atrophy

Identifiers

PMID33895818
PMCPMC8105039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.