Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33895770›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2021

Predicting the Risk of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) or Cardiopulmonary Bypass (CPB) Surgery: Development and Assessment of a Nomogram Prediction Model.

Yi Du, Xiu-Zhe Wang, Wei-Dong Wu, Hai-Peng Shi, Xiao-Jing Yang, Wen-Jing Wu, Shu-Xian Chen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yi DuShanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China (mainland).
Xiu-Zhe WangShanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China (mainland).
Wei-Dong WuShanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China (mainland).
Hai-Peng ShiShanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China (mainland).
Xiao-Jing YangShanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China (mainland).
Wen-Jing WuShanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China (mainland).
Shu-Xian ChenShanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China (mainland).
Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND We sought to create a model that incorporated ultrasound examinations to predict the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 292 patients with AKI after PCI or CPB surgery were enrolled for the study. Afterwards, treatment-related information, including data pertaining to ultrasound examination, was collected. A random forest model and multivariate logistic regression analysis were then used to establish a predictive model for the risk of AKI. Finally, the predictive quality and clinical utility of the model were assessed using calibration plots, receiver-operating characteristic curve, C-index, and decision curve analysis. RESULTS Predictive factors were screened and the model was established with a C-index of 0.955 in the overall sample set. Additionally, an area under the curve of 0.967 was obtained in the training group. Moreover, decision curve analysis also revealed that the prediction model had good clinical applicability. CONCLUSIONS The prediction model was efficient in predicting the risk of AKI by incorporating ultrasound examinations and a number of factors. Such included operation methods, age, congestive heart failure, body mass index, heart rate, white blood cell count, platelet count, hemoglobin, uric acid, and peak intensity (kidney cortex as well as kidney medulla).

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary BypassPercutaneous Coronary InterventionAcute Kidney InjuryAgedFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalNomogramsPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRiskUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID33895770
PMCPMC8083792
OpenAlexW3131135368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.