Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33895721›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Acceptability of intravitreal injections in geographic atrophy: protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study.

Jamie Enoch, Arevik Ghulakhszian, David P Crabb, Christiana Dinah, Deanna J Taylor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Exploring patient acceptability of a short-stay care pathway in hospital post arthroplasty: A theory-informed qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jamie EnochOptometry and Visual Sciences, City University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4614-6676
Arevik GhulakhszianOphthalmology Department, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Central Middlesex Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5503-3892
David P CrabbOptometry and Visual Sciences, City University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8754-3902
Christiana DinahOphthalmology Department, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Central Middlesex Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0815-4771
Deanna J TaylorOptometry and Visual Sciences, City University of London, London, UK Deanna.Taylor.2@city.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8261-5225
City, University of London · GBLondon North West Healthcare NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAge-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a common cause of visual impairment, affecting central vision. Geographic atrophy (GA) is an advanced form of the non-neovascular (dry) type of AMD. Late-stage clinical trials suggest that intravitreal injections of novel therapeutics may slow down the rate of GA progression by up to 30% in 1 year, thus allowing people with GA to preserve central vision for a longer period. While intravitreal injections have become an established treatment modality for neovascular (wet) AMD, it is unknown whether patients with (more gradually progressing) GA would accept regular injections that slow down, but do not stop or reverse, vision loss. Therefore, this mixed-methods pilot study will aim to explore whether regular intravitreal injections will be acceptable as treatment for patients with GA, and the factors that may affect treatment acceptability. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed-methods survey has been designed in collaboration with a GA patient advisory group. The survey comprises of structured questionnaires, semi-structured interview questions regarding patients' perceptions of intravitreal injections and the burden of treatment, and a task eliciting preferences between different potential treatments. Due to COVID-19 restrictions, this study will be conducted remotely by telephone. Thirty individuals will be recruited from NHS Medical Retina clinics at Central Middlesex Hospital, London. Half of the participants will be naïve to intravitreal injections, while half will have previous experience of intravitreal injections for neovascular (wet) AMD. Qualitative data analysis will be conducted using the Framework Method of analysis to identify key themes from participants' accounts. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study received Health Research Authority approval on 23 March 2021 (IRAS Project ID: 287824). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations to the medical retina community, as well as through dialogue with patients and macular disease charities.

Indexed as

Geographic AtrophyTelemedicineWet Macular DegenerationAngiogenesis InhibitorsHumansIntravitreal InjectionsLondonPilot ProjectsAngiogenesis Inhibitorshealth services administration & managementmedical retinaqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID33895721
PMCPMC8074551
OpenAlexW3159644903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.