Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33895601›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental child psychology2021

Understanding relational binding in early childhood: Interacting effects of overlap and delay.

Susan L Benear, Chi T Ngo, Ingrid R Olson, Nora S Newcombe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental child psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susan L BenearDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA. Electronic address: susan.benear@temple.edu.
Chi T NgoCenter for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Ingrid R OlsonDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
Nora S NewcombeDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.

Funding

The Neural Basis of Social KnowledgeR01MH091113 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI OLSON, INGRID R · 2010 to 2019
$3.7M
Mapping the Development of Episodic Memory Diversity SupplementR01HD099165 · NICHD · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI Nora Stefanie Newcombe, Ingrid R Olson · 2020 to 2026
$3.2M
Between Encoding and Retrieval: Behavioral and Neural Indices of Reactivation in Children’s Memory DevelopmentR21HD098509 · NICHD · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI OLSON, INGRID R · 2019 to 2020
$392k
The Neural Basis of Social KnowledgeR56MH091113 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI OLSON, INGRID R · 2020 to 2020
$375k
The development and neural bases of pattern separation and relational memoryF31HD090872 · NICHD · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI NGO, CHI THAO · 2017 to 2018
$60k
NICHD NIH HHS F31 HD090872NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD099165NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD098509NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091113NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH091113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Episodic memories typically share overlapping elements in distinctive combinations, and to be valuable for future behavior they need to withstand delays. There is relatively little work on whether children have special difficulty with overlap or withstanding delay. However, Yim, Dennis, and Sloutsky (Psychological Science, 2013, Vol. 24, pp. 2163-2172) suggested that extensive overlap is more problematic for younger children, and Darby and Sloutsky (Psychological Science, 2015, Vol. 26, pp. 1937-1946) reported that a 48-h delay period actually improves children's memory for overlapping pairs of items. In the current study, we asked how children's episodic memory is affected by stimulus overlap, delay, and age using visual stimuli containing either overlapping or unique item pairs. Children aged 4 and 6 years were tested both immediately and after a 24-h delay. As expected, older children performed better than younger children, and both age groups performed worse on overlapping pairs. Surprisingly, the 24-h delay had only a marginal effect on overall accuracy. Although there were no interactions, when errors were examined, there was evidence that delay buffered memory for overlapping pairs against cross-contextual confusion for younger children.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansChild developmentCognitive developmentDelayed memoryEpisodic memoryMemory interferenceRelational binding

Identifiers

PMID33895601
PMCPMC8147897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.