Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33895331›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology advances

Surrogate broodstock to enhance biotechnology research and applications in aquaculture.

Ye Hwa Jin, Diego Robledo, John M Hickey, Mike J McGrew, Ross D Houston

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Efficient Gene Editing in Fish Primary Germline Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Zoological research · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. 3 Biotech · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ye Hwa JinThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Roslin EH25 9RG, UK.
Diego RobledoThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Roslin EH25 9RG, UK.
John M HickeyThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Roslin EH25 9RG, UK.
Mike J McGrewThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Roslin EH25 9RG, UK.
Ross D HoustonThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Roslin EH25 9RG, UK. Electronic address: ross.houston@roslin.ed.ac.uk.
University of Edinburgh · GBRoslin Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R008612/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S004343/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aquaculture is playing an increasingly important role in meeting global demands for seafood, particularly in low and middle income countries. Genetic improvement of aquaculture species has major untapped potential to help achieve this, with selective breeding and genome editing offering exciting avenues to expedite this process. However, limitations to these breeding and editing approaches include long generation intervals of many fish species, alongside both technical and regulatory barriers to the application of genome editing in commercial production. Surrogate broodstock technology facilitates the production of donor-derived gametes in surrogate parents, and comprises transplantation of germ cells of donors into sterilised recipients. There are many successful examples of intra- and inter-species germ cell transfer and production of viable offspring in finfish, and this leads to new opportunities to address the aforementioned limitations. Firstly, surrogate broodstock technology raises the opportunity to improve genome editing via the use of cultured germ cells, to reduce mosaicism and potentially enable in vivo CRISPR screens in the progeny of surrogate parents. Secondly, the technology has pertinent applications in preservation of aquatic genetic resources, and in facilitating breeding of high-value species which are otherwise difficult to rear in captivity. Thirdly, it holds potential to drastically reduce the effective generation interval in aquaculture breeding programmes, expediting the rate of genetic gain. Finally, it provides new opportunities for dissemination of tailored, potentially genome edited, production animals of high genetic merit for farming. This review focuses on the state-of-the-art of surrogate broodstock technology, and discusses the next steps for its applications in research and production. The integration and synergy of genomics, genome editing, and reproductive technologies have exceptional potential to expedite genetic gain in aquaculture species in the coming decades.

Indexed as

AquacultureGene EditingAnimalsBiotechnologyFishesGenomeAquacultureAquatic genetic resourcesBreedingCRISPRFish farmingGenome editingGenomic selectionGerm cellsSterilisationSurrogate broodstock

Identifiers

PMID33895331
PMCPMC8192414
OpenAlexW3157239196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.