Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33894832›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2021

Vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation for upper limb motor function after ischaemic stroke (VNS-REHAB): a randomised, blinded, pivotal, device trial.

Jesse Dawson, Charles Y Liu, Gerard E Francisco, Steven C Cramer, Steven L Wolf, Anand Dixit, Jen Alexander, Rushna Ali, Benjamin L Brown, Wuwei Feng and 11 more

8 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 8 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 280 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
280citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
25.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03131960 nacompletednot on this map

A Pivotal Randomized Study Assessing Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) During Rehabilitation for Improved Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke (VNS-REHAB)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMicroTransponder Inc.Ran2017 to 2022Enrolled108ConditionsCerebrovascular Stroke, Upper Extremity ParesisArmsPaired Vagus Nerve Stimulation, Rehabilitation
NCT05301140 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Vivistim Registry for Paired VNS Therapy (GRASP)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorMicroTransponder Inc.Ran2023 to 2028Enrolled1,000ConditionsUpper Extremity ProblemArmsVivistim System
NCT05691023 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) During Rehabilitation Using the Vivistim System®: Post-Market Study for Stroke Rehabilitation in a Home Environment for Subjects With Chronic Stroke (VNS-REHAB At-Home)

TypeobservationalSponsorMicroTransponder Inc.Ran2023 to 2028Enrolled50ConditionsIschemic Stroke, Upper Extremity ProblemArmsVivistim System
NCT05694663 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Vagal Nerve Stimulation in Enhanced Stroke Recovery: The VALOR Registry

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiRan2024 to 2028Enrolled40ConditionsChronic Ischemic StrokeArmsVivistim
NCT05943431 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Double-blind Controlled Trial Investigating the Efficacy of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) in Improving Upper Extremity Motor Function in Stroke Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorQiuyou XieRan2023 to 2025Enrolled150ConditionsUpper Extremity Dysfunction, StrokeArmspaired taVNS, Unpaired taVNS, Sham taVNS
NCT06623721 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility and Tolerance of Movement-activated Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Motor Rehabilitation

TypeinterventionalSponsorOlivier LambercyRan2024 to 2025Enrolled10ConditionsStroke Rehabilitation, NeurorehabilitationArmsMovement-evoked transcutaneous auricular Vagus nerve stimulation
NCT06722677 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Multi-Center, Triple-Blind, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Rehabilitation Paired with Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Upper Extremity Motor Function in Patients with Ischemic Stroke (Repair Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Pins Medical Co., LtdRan2024 to 2025Enrolled99ConditionsIschemic Stroke, Upper Extremity ParesisArmsVNS, Sham VNS, Rehabilitation
NCT06895005 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundación Cardiovascular de ColombiaRan2025 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsMotor Impairment, Motor Impairments, Stroke, StrokeArmsTranscutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation + rehabilitation therapy, sham stimulation + rehabilitation therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

280 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 446 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Systematic review: Resting state functional MRI as a biomarker for non-invasive brain stimulation in upper limb recovery post-stroke.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Effects of home-based neurostimulation on outcomes after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

220 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 16 institutions in 2 countries.

Jesse DawsonInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. Electronic address: jesse.dawson@glasgow.ac.uk.
Charles Y LiuUSC Neurorestoration Center and Department of Neurological Surgery, USC Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, CA, USA.
Gerard E FranciscoDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Texas Health Science Center McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA; The Institute for Rehabilitation and Research (TIRR) Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Steven C CramerDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; California Rehabilitation Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Steven L WolfDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Division of Physical Therapy, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Anand DixitStroke Service, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK.
Jen AlexanderInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Rushna AliDepartment of Neurosciences, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Benjamin L BrownDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ochsner Neuroscience Institute, Covington, LA, USA.
Wuwei FengDepartment of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Louis DeMarkBrooks Rehabilitation, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Leigh R HochbergDepartment of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; School of Engineering and Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA.
Steven A KautzRalph H Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Health Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Arshad MajidSheffield Institute for Neurological Sciences (SITraN), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; Sheffield Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Michael W O'DellClinical Rehabilitation Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY, USA.
David PierceMicroTransponder, Austin, TX, USA.
Cecília N PrudenteMicroTransponder, Austin, TX, USA.
Jessica RedgraveSheffield Institute for Neurological Sciences (SITraN), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Duncan L TurnerSchool of Health, Sport and Bioscience, University of East London, London, UK.
Navzer D EngineerMicroTransponder, Austin, TX, USA.
Teresa J KimberleyDepartment of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Physical Therapy, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA.
MicroTransponder (United States) · USUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GBBrooks Rehabilitation Clinical Research Center · USCenter for Neuro-Oncology · USCornell University · USDuke University · USEmory University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBRalph H. Johnson VA Medical Center · USRancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center · USSpectrum Health · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of East London · GB

Funding

Treating Depression and Enhancing Locomotor Recovery Post-strokeP20GM109040 · NIGMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KAUTZ, STEVEN A. · 2014 to 2024
$23.5M
Techniques DevelopmentP2CHD086844 · NICHD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI GEORGE, MARK S · 2015 to 2024
$12.7M
RR&D Research Career Scientist Award ApplicationIK6RX003075 · VA · RALPH H JOHNSON VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI KAUTZ, STEVEN A. · 2020 to 2025
–
Medical Research Council MR/R005923/1NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109040RRD VA IK6 RX003075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-term loss of arm function after ischaemic stroke is common and might be improved by vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation. We aimed to determine whether this strategy is a safe and effective treatment for improving arm function after stroke.

methodsIn this pivotal, randomised, triple-blind, sham-controlled trial, done in 19 stroke rehabilitation services in the UK and the USA, participants with moderate-to-severe arm weakness, at least 9 months after ischaemic stroke, were randomly assigned (1:1) to either rehabilitation paired with active vagus nerve stimulation (VNS group) or rehabilitation paired with sham stimulation (control group). Randomisation was done by ResearchPoint Global (Austin, TX, USA) using SAS PROC PLAN (SAS Institute Software, Cary, NC, USA), with stratification by region (USA vs UK), age (≤30 years vs >30 years), and baseline Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score (20-35 vs 36-50). Participants, outcomes assessors, and treating therapists were masked to group assignment. All participants were implanted with a vagus nerve stimulation device. The VNS group received 0·8 mA, 100 μs, 30 Hz stimulation pulses, lasting 0·5 s. The control group received 0 mA pulses. Participants received 6 weeks of in-clinic therapy (three times per week; total of 18 sessions) followed by a home exercise programme. The primary outcome was the change in impairment measured by the FMA-UE score on the first day after completion of in-clinic therapy. FMA-UE response rates were also assessed at 90 days after in-clinic therapy (secondary endpoint). All analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03131960.

findingsBetween Oct 2, 2017, and Sept 12, 2019, 108 participants were randomly assigned to treatment (53 to the VNS group and 55 to the control group). 106 completed the study (one patient for each group did not complete the study). On the first day after completion of in-clinic therapy, the mean FMA-UE score increased by 5·0 points (SD 4·4) in the VNS group and by 2·4 points (3·8) in the control group (between group difference 2·6, 95% CI 1·0-4·2, p=0·0014). 90 days after in-clinic therapy, a clinically meaningful response on the FMA-UE score was achieved in 23 (47%) of 53 patients in the VNS group versus 13 (24%) of 55 patients in the control group (between group difference 24%, 6-41; p=0·0098). There was one serious adverse event related to surgery (vocal cord paresis) in the control group.

interpretationVagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation is a novel potential treatment option for people with long-term moderate-to-severe arm impairment after ischaemic stroke.

fundingMicroTransponder.

Indexed as

AgedCase-Control StudiesCombined Modality TherapyExercise TherapyFemaleHumansImplantable NeurostimulatorsIschemic StrokeMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareParesisRecovery of FunctionStroke RehabilitationTreatment OutcomeUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID33894832
PMCPMC8862193
OpenAlexW3153909772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 2 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.