Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33894784›Full record

ReviewAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2021

The niche of One Health approaches in Lassa fever surveillance and control.

Liã Bárbara Arruda, Najmul Haider, Ayodeji Olayemi, David Simons, Deborah Ehichioya, Adesola Yinka-Ogunleye, Rashid Ansumana, Margaret J Thomason, Danny Asogun, Chikwe Ihekweazu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Impact of seasonal change on virus-rodent dynamics in NigeriaCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. RNA virus diversity in rodents.Archives of microbiology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Liã Bárbara ArrudaCentre for Clinical Microbiology, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK. l.arruda@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3539-8154
Najmul HaiderThe Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hatfield, UK.
Ayodeji OlayemiNatural History Museum, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife, Nigeria.
David SimonsThe Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hatfield, UK.
Deborah EhichioyaInstitute of Lassa Fever Research and Control, Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital, Irrua, Nigeria.
Adesola Yinka-OgunleyeNigeria Centre for Disease Control, Abuja, Nigeria.
Rashid AnsumanaSchool of Community Health Sciences, Njala University, Bo, Sierra Leone.
Margaret J ThomasonCentre for Clinical Microbiology, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK.
Danny AsogunInstitute of Lassa Fever Research and Control, Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital, Irrua, Nigeria.
Chikwe IhekweazuNigeria Centre for Disease Control, Abuja, Nigeria.
Elisabeth Fichet-CalvetDepartment of Virology, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Richard A KockThe Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hatfield, UK.
University of London · GBIrrua Specialist Teaching Hospital · NGNigeria Centre for Disease Control · NGBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine · DENjala University · SLObafemi Awolowo University · NGUCL Biomedical Research Centre · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M009513/1European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership RIA2016E-1609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lassa fever (LF), a zoonotic illness, represents a public health burden in West African countries where the Lassa virus (LASV) circulates among rodents. Human exposure hinges significantly on LASV ecology, which is in turn shaped by various parameters such as weather seasonality and even virus and rodent-host genetics. Furthermore, human behaviour, despite playing a key role in the zoonotic nature of the disease, critically affects either the spread or control of human-to-human transmission. Previous estimations on LF burden date from the 80s and it is unclear how the population expansion and the improvement on diagnostics and surveillance methods have affected such predictions. Although recent data have contributed to the awareness of epidemics, the real impact of LF in West African communities will only be possible with the intensification of interdisciplinary efforts in research and public health approaches. This review discusses the causes and consequences of LF from a One Health perspective, and how the application of this concept can improve the surveillance and control of this disease in West Africa.

Indexed as

Lassa virusOne HealthAfrica, WesternAnimalsDisease ReservoirsHumansLassa FeverPublic HealthRodentiaEmerging infectious diseasesLassa feverOne HealthZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID33894784
PMCPMC8067790
OpenAlexW3159502776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.