Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33894496›Full record

Trial reportLung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021

Short Communication: Interim toxicity analysis for patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer (LSCLC) treated on CALGB 30610 (Alliance) / RTOG 0538.

Jeffrey A Bogart, Xiaofei Wang, Gregory A Masters, Junheng Gao, Ritsuko Komaki, Laurie E Gaspar, John V Heymach, Michael Christian Dobelbower, Charles Kuzma, Thomas E Stinchcombe and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. High-Dose Once-Daily Thoracic Radiotherapy in Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: CALGB 30610 (Alliance)/RTOG 0538.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Radiation and Systemic Therapy for Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey A BogartState University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States. Electronic address: bogartj@upstate.edu.
Xiaofei WangAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Gregory A MastersHelen Graham Cancer Center, Newark, DE, United States.
Junheng GaoAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Ritsuko KomakiBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
Laurie E GasparBanner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Greeley, CO, United States.
John V HeymachMD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States.
Michael Christian DobelbowerUniversity of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Charles KuzmaFirstHealth of the Carolinas-Moore Regional Hospital, Pinehurst, NC, United States.
Thomas E StinchcombeDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.
Everett E VokesUniversity of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, United States.
Duke University · USBaylor College of Medicine · USDuke Medical Center · USFirstHealth of the Carolinas · USSUNY Upstate Medical University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
Statistics CoreU10CA180882 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Sumithra Jay Mandrekar · 2014 to 2026
$115.0M
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Network Lead Academic Participating Site (LAP) UG1UG1CA233329 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KELLY K HUNT, CHELSEA Camille PINNIX · 2019 to 2026
$11.1M
NCI National Clinical Trials Network - Lead Academic Participating SiteUG1CA233324 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ANTHONY D ELIAS · 2019 to 2026
$5.2M
UG1 - NCTN (Network Lead)UG1CA233327 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI STEVEN J CHMURA, HEDY L KINDLER · 2019 to 2026
$4.4M
The Duke University - Duke Cancer Institute National Clinical Trials Network LAPS (UG1) Support GrantUG1CA233253 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI John H Strickler, Alexandra Thomas · 2019 to 2026
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180882NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233253NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233324NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233327NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233329
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe CALGB 30610/RTOG 0538 randomized trial was designed to test whether high-dose thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) would improve survival compared with 45 Gy twice-daily (BID) TRT in limited stage small cell lung cancer (LSCLC). Two piloted experimental TRT regimens were of interest to study, 70 Gy daily (QD) and 61.2 Gy concomitant boost (CB). Driven by concerns about adequate patient accrual, a study design was employed that eliminated one experimental TRT arm based on early interim toxicity and tolerability, with the study then continuing as a traditional 2-arm phase III study.

methodsPatients with LSCLC were assigned to receive four cycles of cisplatin and etoposide chemotherapy with one of 3 TRT regimens starting with either the first or second cycle of chemotherapy. The interim endpoint was the cumulative highest toxicity calculated from a scoring system based on treatment-related grade 3 and higher toxicity and the ability to complete therapy in the experimental arms.

resultsThe final interim analysis was performed after 70 patients accrued to each experimental cohort, and a difference in treatment related toxicity scoring was not found (p = 0.739). Severe esophageal toxicity was comparable in both cohorts. Pulmonary toxicity was low overall, though 4 patients (5.7 %) on the 61.2 Gy arm developed grade 4 dyspnea, which was not observed in the 70 Gy arm. A protocol mandated decision was made to discontinue the 61.2 Gy arm following review of toxicity with the Data and Safety Monitoring Board.

conclusionA randomized trial design using a planned early interim toxicity analysis to discriminate between experimental treatment arms is feasible in a phase III setting. Refinement of the design could increase the likelihood of detecting clinically meaningful differences in toxicity in future studies.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCisplatinCombined Modality TherapyEtoposideHumansRadiotherapy DosageTreatment OutcomeCisplatinEtoposideFractionationRadiotherapy doseSmall cell

Identifiers

PMID33894496
PMCPMC8418826
OpenAlexW3155206552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.