Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33894476›Full record

ArticleEvaluation and program planning2021

Theory of change models deepen online learning evaluation.

Olivia M Chesniak, Denise Drane, Celine Young, Sarah Chobot Hokanson, Bennett B Goldberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evaluation and program planning, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olivia M ChesniakNorthwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Denise DraneNorthwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Celine YoungBoston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Sarah Chobot HokansonBoston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Bennett B GoldbergNorthwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. Electronic address: bennett.goldberg@northwestern.edu.

Funding

Supporting postdoctoral mentoring relationships through expanding the Postdoc Academy programR25GM121257 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI BIFANO, THOMAS G, GOLDBERG, BENNETT B · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM121257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have gained traction as resources for professional development. This article presents the method that we used to evaluate a professional development MOOC for postdoctoral trainees that was created by a university consortium in the US. Most approaches to evaluating MOOCs focus on analysis of participation, outcomes from course assignments, self-reported learning outcomes, course completion and user pathways through the online content or clickstream data. Few published evaluations describe in detail how learning happens within online courses and the anticipated medium and longer term cognitive and behavioral outcomes on participants. This work aims to guide those who are designing, implementing and evaluating MOOCs through applying theories of change to focus evaluation on the process of learning. This approach can be used as a complement to traditional approaches for evaluating MOOCs. We described how we worked with the MOOC team building the content to develop a theory of change for each module (or lesson) within the MOOC and used the theory of change to guide evaluation of short and medium term participant cognitive, affective and attitudinal, and behavioral outcomes. Finally, we share lessons learned and suggestions for implementing theories of change in both the design and evaluation phases of MOOC development.

Indexed as

Education, DistanceEducational MeasurementHumansProgram EvaluationResearch DesignUniversitiesEvaluationMassive open online courseOnline learningProfessional developmentStudent outcomesTheory of change

Identifiers

PMID33894476
PMCPMC8206009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.