ArticleContraception2021
Changes to medication abortion clinical practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Contraception, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Reproductive justice in the time of COVID-19: a systematic review of the indirect impacts of COVID-19 on sexual and reproductive health.Reproductive health · 2021Pooled it
- No-Test Screening Protocols May Disproportionately Exclude Structurally Oppressed Communities Who Could Benefit from Accessing Medication Abortion.Health equity · 2025Article
- Self-diagnosing the end of pregnancy after medication abortion.Culture, health & sexuality · 2024Article
- COVID-19 and abortion in the Ohio River Valley: A case study of Kentucky, Ohio, and West Virginia.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2023Article
- "I'm going to be forced to have a baby": A study of COVID-19 abortion experiences on Reddit.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2023Article
- A qualitative analysis of pharmacists' attitudes towards provision of medication abortion.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Intrauterine device self-removal practices during the COVID-19 pandemic among family planning clinics.Contraception · 2023Article
- Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2020.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2022Article
- Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2020.Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002) · 2022Article
- Changes in the Clinical Workforce Providing Contraception and Abortion Care in the US, 2019-2021.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- [Induced abortion and COVID-19 : What changed with the pandemic in 2020].Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique · 2022Article
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to and utilisation of services for sexual and reproductive health: a scoping review.BMJ global health · 2022Article
- The association of U.S. state-level abortion restrictions with medication abortion service delivery innovations during the early COVID-19 pandemic.Contraception · 2022Article
- Medication abortion: A perfect solution?Health services research · 2022Article
- Comparison of Pregnancy Preferences Preceding vs Year 1 of the COVID-19 Pandemic.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Impact of COVID-19 on abortion method under ten weeks gestational age in Southern California.Contraception · 2022Article
- Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and first lockdown on pregnancy monitoring in France: the COVIMATER cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo document medication abortion clinical practice changes adopted by providers in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY
designLongitudinal descriptive study, comprised of three online surveys conducted between April to December, 2020. We recruited sites from email lists of national abortion and family planning organizations.
resultsSeventy-four sites opted to participate. We analyzed 55/74 sites (74%) that provided medication abortion and completed all three surveys. The total number of abortion encounters reported by the sites remained consistent throughout the study period, though medication abortion encounters increased while first-trimester aspiration abortion encounters decreased. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, sites reduced the number of in-person visits associated with medication abortion and confirmation of successful termination. In February 2020, considered prepandemic, 39/55 sites (71%) required 2 or more patient visits for a medication abortion. By April 2020, 19/55 sites (35%) reported reducing the total number of in-person visits associated with a medication abortion. As of October 2020, 37 sites indicated newly adopting a practice of offering medication abortion follow-up with no in-person visits.
conclusionsSites quickly adopted protocols incorporating practices that are well-supported in the literature, including forgoing Rh-testing and pre-abortion ultrasound in some circumstances and relying on patient report of symptoms or home pregnancy tests to confirm successful completion of medication abortion. Importantly, these practices reduce face-to-face interactions and the opportunity for virus transmission. Sustaining these changes even after the public health crisis is over may increase patient access to abortion, and these impacts should be evaluated in future research. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: Medication abortion serves a critical function in maintaining access to abortion when there are limitations to in-person clinic visits. Sites throughout the country successfully and quickly adopted protocols that reduced visits associated with the abortion, reducing in-person screenings, relying on telehealth, and implementing remote follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.