Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33894130›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2021

Personalised randomised controlled trial designs-a new paradigm to define optimal treatments for carbapenem-resistant infections.

A Sarah Walker, Ian R White, Rebecca M Turner, Li Yang Hsu, Tsin Wen Yeo, Nicholas J White, Mike Sharland, Guy E Thwaites

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07004049 (TREAT-GNB [CR-GNB]), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07004049 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Treat-gnb [cr-gnb]

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational University of SingaporeRan2025 to 2028Enrolled600ConditionsBloodstream Infection, Ventilator Associated Bacterial Pneumonia, Hospital Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia, Carbapenem Resistant Bacterial InfectionArmsColistin/Polymyxin B + Sulbactam, Colistin/Polymyxin B + Tigecycline/Eravacycline, Colistin/Polymyxin B + Meropenem, Ceftazidime-avibactam + Sulbactam, Ceftazidime-avibactam + Fosfomycin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. ASM case reports · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

A Sarah WalkerMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK; Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ian R WhiteMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK.
Rebecca M TurnerMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK.
Li Yang HsuNational University of Singapore, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Singapore.
Tsin Wen YeoLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Nicholas J WhiteCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Mahidol-Oxford Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mike SharlandSt George's University of London, London, UK.
Guy E ThwaitesCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; and Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Electronic address: gthwaites@oucru.org.
University College London · GBMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBNanyang Technological University · SGNational University Health System · SGOxford University Clinical Research Unit · VNSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC_UU_00004/05Medical Research Council MC_UU_00004/09Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/22Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/29Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance is impacting treatment decisions for, and patient outcomes from, bacterial infections worldwide, with particular threats from infections with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumanii, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Numerous areas of clinical uncertainty surround the treatment of these highly resistant infections, yet substantial obstacles exist to the design and conduct of treatment trials for carbapenem-resistant bacterial infections. These include the lack of a widely acceptable optimised standard of care and control regimens, varying antimicrobial susceptibilities and clinical contraindications making specific intervention regimens infeasible, and diagnostic and recruitment challenges. The current single comparator trials are not designed to answer the urgent public health question, identified as a high priority by WHO, of what are the best regimens out of the available options that will significantly reduce morbidity, costs, and mortality. This scenario has an analogy in network meta-analysis, which compares multiple treatments in an evidence synthesis to rank the best of a set of available treatments. To address these obstacles, we propose extending the network meta-analysis approach to individual randomisation of patients. We refer to this approach as a Personalised RAndomised Controlled Trial (PRACTical) design that compares multiple treatments in an evidence synthesis, to identify, overall, which is the best treatment out of a set of available treatments to recommend, or how these different treatments rank against each other. In this Personal View, we summarise the design principles of personalised randomised controlled trial designs. Specifically, of a network of different potential regimens for life-threatening carbapenem-resistant infections, each patient would be randomly assigned only to regimens considered clinically reasonable for that patient at that time, incorporating antimicrobial susceptibility, toxicity profile, pharmacometric properties, availability, and physician assessment. Analysis can use both direct and indirect comparisons across the network, analogous to network meta-analysis. This new trial design will maximise the relevance of the findings to each individual patient, and enable the top-ranked regimens from any personalised randomisation list to be identified, in terms of both efficacy and safety.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeCarbapenemsClinical Decision-MakingEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenems

Identifiers

PMID33894130
PMCPMC7614698
OpenAlexW3094160409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.