Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33893863›Full record

ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2021

Thermodynamic basis of the α-helix and DNA duplex.

A I Dragan, C Crane-Robinson, P L Privalov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A I DraganInstitute of High Technologies, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine.
C Crane-RobinsonBiophysics Laboratories, School of Biology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 2DT, UK. colyn.crane-robinson@port.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6853-5293
P L Privalov *Department of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.

Funding

NIH HHS 105365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of calorimetric and crystallographic information shows that the α-helix is maintained not only by the hydrogen bonds between its polar peptide groups, as originally supposed, but also by van der Waals interactions between tightly packed apolar groups in the interior of the helix. These apolar contacts are responsible for about 60% of the forces stabilizing the folded conformation of the α-helix and their exposure to water on unfolding results in the observed heat capacity increment, i.e. the temperature dependence of the melting enthalpy. The folding process is also favoured by an entropy increase resulting from the release of water from the peptide groups. A similar situation holds for the DNA double helix: calorimetry shows that the hydrogen bonding between conjugate base pairs provides a purely entropic contribution of about 40% to the Gibbs energy while the enthalpic van der Waals interactions between the tightly packed apolar parts of the base pairs provide the remaining 60%. Despite very different structures, the thermodynamic basis of α-helix and B-form duplex stability are strikingly similar. The general conclusion follows that the stability of protein folds is primarily dependent on internal atomic close contacts rather than the hydrogen bonds they contain.

Indexed as

ThermodynamicsDNAHydrogen BondingPeptidesProtein Conformation, alpha-HelicalWaterDNAPeptidesWaterDNA double helixHydrogen bondingStabilityVan der Waals interactionsα-Helix

Identifiers

PMID33893863
PMCPMC8260414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.