ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2021
Natural silicate nanoparticles: separation, characterization, and assessment of stability and perspectives of their use as reference nanomaterials.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel zone elution mode in coiled tube field-flow fractionation for online separation and characterization of environmental submicron particles.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023Article
- The Yin and Yang of epigenetics in the field of nanoparticles.Nanoscale advances · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Natural nanomaterials, which play a very important role in environmental processes, are so far poorly studied. Firstly, the separation of nanoparticles from the bulk sample is a challenge. Secondly, the absence of reference natural nanomaterials makes it impossible to compare the results obtained by different researchers and develop a unified methodology for the separation and characterization of natural nanomaterials. Therefore, the development of reference natural nanomaterials is an urgent need of the environmental analytical chemistry. In this work, mineral nanoparticles (kaolinite, montmorillonite, muscovite, and quartz) have been studied as potential reference natural nanomaterials. A set of analytical methods including coiled-tube field-flow fractionation, scanning electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering, laser diffraction, inductively coupled plasma atomic emission, and mass spectrometry are applied to the separation and characterization of nanoparticles. It has been shown by laser diffraction that 93-98% of separated mineral nanoparticles are in the size range from about 40 to 300 nm, while 2-7% have size up to 830 nm. The size range of particles is confirmed by electron microscopy. Major (Al, Na, K, Ca, Fe), trace (Ti, Co, Cu, Zn, Tl, Pb, Bi, etc.), and rare earth elements have been determined in the suspensions of kaolinite, montmorillonite, and muscovite nanoparticles. Based on Al content, the concentration of mineral nanoparticles in suspensions is estimated. Agglomeration stability (consistency of size distribution) of nanoparticles at pH 6-8 is assessed. It has been shown that muscovite nanoparticles are stable at pH 7-8, whereas montmorillonite nanoparticles are stable only at pH 8 for at least 4 weeks. A noticeable agglomeration of kaolinite nanoparticles is observed at pH 6-8. Due to the low concentration of quartz nanoparticles, their characterization and stability assessment are hindered. The challenges of the development of reference natural nanomaterials are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33893833What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.