Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33893692›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2021

A Phase II Study of Durvalumab in Combination with Tremelimumab in Patients with Rare Cancers.

William Jeffery Edenfield, Ki Chung, Mark O'Rourke, Elizabeth Cull, Julie Martin, Heather Bowers, Wesley Smith, William Larry Gluck

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02938793 (A Phase II Study of Durvalumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02938793 phase2terminatednot on this map

A Phase II Study of Durvalumab (MEDI4736) (Anti-PD-L1 Antibody) in Combination With Tremelimumab (Anti-CTLA-4 Antibody) in Subjects With Advanced Rare Solid Tumors

TypeinterventionalSponsorPrisma Health-UpstateRan2016 to 2025Enrolled92ConditionsCancer, Rare DiseaseArmsDurvalumab, Tremelimumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

William Jeffery EdenfieldPrisma Health Cancer Institute, Greenville, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8232-2318
Ki ChungPrisma Health Cancer Institute, Greenville, South Carolina, USA.
Mark O'RourkePrisma Health Cancer Institute, Greenville, South Carolina, USA.
Elizabeth CullPrisma Health Cancer Institute, Greenville, South Carolina, USA.
Julie MartinPrisma Health Cancer Institute, Greenville, South Carolina, USA.
Heather BowersPrisma Health Cancer Institute, Greenville, South Carolina, USA.
Wesley SmithPrisma Health Cancer Institute, Greenville, South Carolina, USA.
William Larry GluckPrisma Health Cancer Institute, Greenville, South Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

lessons learnedDisease control with signals of response were demonstrated, which should lead to future validating clinical trials using checkpoint inhibitors in this underserved rare malignancy population. Although the study of single types of rare cancers is practically challenging, clinical trial designs that aggregate such patients into cohorts treated similarly are feasible, even in the community setting.

backgroundPatients with rare cancers are an underserved population with limited access to clinical trials aside from phase I trials in the refractory setting. Treatment of these patients is often based on collections of anecdotes and small denominator review articles. Despite broad evidence of efficacy of combined immune checkpoint blockade across multiple tumor types, patients with rare tumors have not been afforded the opportunity for these therapies.

methodsA phase II, investigator-initiated, single institution trial using durvalumab (1,500 mg every [Q]4 weeks × 13) and tremelimumab (75 mg Q4 weeks × 7, then Q12 weeks × 2) is reported. The population included 50 patients with advanced rare solid tumors (incidence <6/100,000 per year). The phase II dose and safety profile were defined in prior phase I trials. All patients had exhausted standard therapy options and all had received at least one prior line of systemic therapy (n = 49) unless a standard treatment option did not exist (n = 1).

resultsA complete response was demonstrated in one patient with anal cancer. Striking partial responses were seen in four patients. Prolonged disease stability was noted in 18 patients. Thirteen patients experienced disease progression. Patients were considered unevaluable if unable to initiate therapy (n = 6) or unable to complete two cycles of therapy (n = 8). In all cases, patients were unevaluable because of clinical deterioration. The toxicity profile paralleled prior published studies. Toxicities were manageable and without new signals. There were two events of grade 4 immune-mediated hepatitis and one death from pneumonitis.

conclusionThis single-cohort basket trial demonstrated clinical activity from combined checkpoint blockade in 23 of the 36 evaluable patients. Patients with rare cancers, not eligible for immunotherapy via conventional clinical trial mechanisms, should be considered for this therapy through compassionate use, further clinical trials, and national registry programs.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsNeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizeddurvalumabtremelimumabCheckpoint inhibitorsClinical trialImmunotherapyRare cancers

Identifiers

PMID33893692
PMCPMC8417875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.