Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33893612›Full record

ArticleIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2022

Anthropological Prosociality via Sub-Group Level Selection.

Benjamin Heslop, Kylie Bailey, Elizabeth Stojanovski, Jonathan Paul, Antony Drew

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin HeslopSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan Campus, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. benjamin.heslop@uon.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9465-558X
Kylie BaileySchool of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan Campus, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8109-7662
Elizabeth StojanovskiSchool of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Newcastle, Callaghan Campus, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Jonathan PaulSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan Campus, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3064-6358
Antony DrewNewcastle Business School, University of Newcastle, Callaghan Campus, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8024-6072
University of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A perennial challenge of evolutionary psychology is explaining prosocial traits such as a preference for fairness rather than inequality, compassion towards suffering, and an instinctive ability to coordinate within small teams. Considering recent fossil evidence and a novel logical test, we deem present explanations insufficiently explanatory of the divergence of hominins. In answering this question, we focus on the divergence of hominins from the last common ancestor (LCA) shared with Pan. We consider recent fossil discoveries that indicate the LCA was bipedal, which reduces the cogency of this explanation for hominin development. We also review evolutionary theory that claims to explain how hominins developed into modern humans, however it is found that no mechanism differentiates hominins from other primates. Either the mechanism was available to the last common ancestor (LCA) (with P. troglodytes as its proxy), or because early hominins had insufficient cognition to utilise the mechanism. A novel mechanism, sub-group level selection (sGLS) is hypothesised by triangulating two pieces of data rarely considered by evolutionary biologists. These are behavioural dimorphism of Pan (chimpanzees and bonobos) that remain identifiable in modern humans, and the social behaviour of primate troops in a savannah ecology. We then contend that sGLS supplied an exponential effect which was available to LCA who left the forest, but was not sufficiently available to any other primates. In conclusion, while only indirectly supported by various evidence, sGLS is found to be singularly and persuasively explanatory of human's unique evolutionary story.

Indexed as

HominidaeAnimalsBiological EvolutionFossilsHumansPan troglodytesSocial BehaviorAgonicEgalityEvolutionHedonicHierarchyProsocialReciprocity

Identifiers

PMID33893612
OpenAlexW3154831991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.