ArticleInternational orthopaedics2021
Low complication rate and better results for intramedullary nail - arthrodesis for infected knee joints compared to external fixator-a series of one hundred fifty two patients.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comparative analysis of three knee arthrodesis techniques to manage failed total knee arthroplasty due to infection: intramedullary nailing, LRS external fixator, and compression plating.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Knee Arthrodesis for Periprosthetic Knee Infection: Fusion Rate, Complications, and Limb Salvage-A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeArthrodesis of the knee joint is still a salvage procedure after recurrent prosthetic joint infections (PJI) of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) with substantial bone loss and seems to be a good solution to avoid amputation. Until now, intramedullary arthrodesis has increasingly been performed; no study has yet been published to compare these techniques after septic removal of TKA in terms of functional assessment and quality of daily life.
methodsIn a single-centre retrospective setting, clinical and radiographic evaluation of consecutive patients after knee arthrodesis using intramedullary and external fixation for infected knee joints was performed. All patients were evaluated clinically, with x-ray and questionnaire including analysis regarding any complications at latest follow-up of a minimum 12 months postoperatively.
resultsWe included 152 patients (75 females, 77 males) in this study. The mean age of the patients at surgery was 63.6 years (range 12 to 90 years). The minimum follow-up was 12 months (mean 3.1 years, range 12 to 49 months). Arthrodesis with external fixator (83 patients, 52.2%) showed less blood loss and less peri-operative complications (1.6%) but a high rate of post-operative, pin-track infections (35.5%); loose pins (12.7%); and pin fractures (4.8%), and therefore risk factors for instability and nonunion (30.9%). Revision rate was 22.6% for arthrodesis with external fixator, and the primary union rate was 65.6%. Intramedullary arthrodesis (69 patients, 43.4%) showed a similar re-infection rate to external fixation (16.1% and 15.9%, respectively) but a significantly lower revision rate (5.4%, p < 0.001). Eighty percent of patients with intramedullary arthrodesis showed very good patient-related outcomes regarding pain, function and daily life activities in the questionnaire.
conclusionDespite similar results regarding patient satisfaction and everyday competences in questionnaires, intramedullary arthrodesis of the knee is superior to the external fixator, as it results in fewer complications, lower revision rate, and union rates/loosening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.