Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33893390›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2021

Ecological niche adaptation of Salmonella Typhimurium U288 is associated with altered pathogenicity and reduced zoonotic potential.

Mark Kirkwood, Prerna Vohra, Matt Bawn, Gaëtan Thilliez, Hannah Pye, Jennifer Tanner, Cosmin Chintoan-Uta, Priscilla Branchu, Liljana Petrovska, Timothy Dallman and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Host adaptation inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Prophage diversity in poultry-associatedFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Phytochemicals: potential alternative strategy to fightFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Genomic Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mark KirkwoodQuadram Institute Biosciences, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK.
Prerna VohraRoslin Institute, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1948-7387
Matt BawnQuadram Institute Biosciences, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK.
Gaëtan ThilliezQuadram Institute Biosciences, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8650-4477
Hannah PyeQuadram Institute Biosciences, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4323-7564
Jennifer TannerQuadram Institute Biosciences, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK.
Cosmin Chintoan-UtaRoslin Institute, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
Priscilla BranchuQuadram Institute Biosciences, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK.
Liljana PetrovskaAnimal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, KT15 3NB, UK.
Timothy DallmanRoslin Institute, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
Neil HallEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UZ, UK.
Mark P StevensRoslin Institute, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
Robert A KingsleyQuadram Institute Biosciences, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK. rob.kingsley@quadram.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0194-6485
Norwich Research Park · GBRoslin Institute · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBAnimal and Plant Health Agency · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M021114/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M025411/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M025489/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N007964/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R012504/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of new bacterial pathogens is a continuing challenge for agriculture and food safety. Salmonella Typhimurium is a major cause of foodborne illness worldwide, with pigs a major zoonotic reservoir. Two phylogenetically distinct variants, U288 and ST34, emerged in UK pigs around the same time but present different risk to food safety. Here we show using genomic epidemiology that ST34 accounts for over half of all S. Typhimurium infections in people while U288 less than 2%. That the U288 clade evolved in the recent past by acquiring AMR genes, indels in the virulence plasmid pU288-1, and accumulation of loss-of-function polymorphisms in coding sequences. U288 replicates more slowly and is more sensitive to desiccation than ST34 isolates and exhibited distinct pathogenicity in the murine model of colitis and in pigs. U288 infection was more disseminated in the lymph nodes while ST34 were recovered in greater numbers in the intestinal contents. These data are consistent with the evolution of S. Typhimurium U288 adaptation to pigs that may determine their reduced zoonotic potential.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalAnimalsBacterial ZoonosesEcosystemEnglandSalmonella InfectionsSalmonella Infections, AnimalSalmonella typhimuriumVirulenceWales

Identifiers

PMID33893390
PMCPMC8065163
OpenAlexW3154734824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.