Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33893309›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Brockarchaeota, a novel archaeal phylum with unique and versatile carbon cycling pathways.

Valerie De Anda, Lin-Xing Chen, Nina Dombrowski, Zheng-Shuang Hua, Hong-Chen Jiang, Jillian F Banfield, Wen-Jun Li, Brett J Baker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The dynamic history of prokaryotic phyla: discovery, diversity and division.International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Evidence for nontraditionalScience advances · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Valerie De AndaDepartment of Marine Science, University of Texas Austin, Port Aransas, TX, 78373, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9775-0737
Lin-Xing ChenDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Nina DombrowskiDepartment of Marine Science, University of Texas Austin, Port Aransas, TX, 78373, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1917-2577
Zheng-Shuang HuaDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, PR China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2405-4228
Hong-Chen JiangState Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Jillian F BanfieldDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8203-8771
Wen-Jun LiState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Resources and Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. liwenjun3@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1233-736X
Brett J BakerDepartment of Marine Science, University of Texas Austin, Port Aransas, TX, 78373, USA. acidophile@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5971-1021
Planetary Science Institute · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USChina University of Geosciences · CNRoyal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research · NLUniversity of Science and Technology of China · CNXinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geothermal environments, such as hot springs and hydrothermal vents, are hotspots for carbon cycling and contain many poorly described microbial taxa. Here, we reconstructed 15 archaeal metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) from terrestrial hot spring sediments in China and deep-sea hydrothermal vent sediments in Guaymas Basin, Gulf of California. Phylogenetic analyses of these MAGs indicate that they form a distinct group within the TACK superphylum, and thus we propose their classification as a new phylum, 'Brockarchaeota', named after Thomas Brock for his seminal research in hot springs. Based on the MAG sequence information, we infer that some Brockarchaeota are uniquely capable of mediating non-methanogenic anaerobic methylotrophy, via the tetrahydrofolate methyl branch of the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway and reductive glycine pathway. The hydrothermal vent genotypes appear to be obligate fermenters of plant-derived polysaccharides that rely mostly on substrate-level phosphorylation, as they seem to lack most respiratory complexes. In contrast, hot spring lineages have alternate pathways to increase their ATP yield, including anaerobic methylotrophy of methanol and trimethylamine, and potentially use geothermally derived mercury, arsenic, or hydrogen. Their broad distribution and their apparent anaerobic metabolic versatility indicate that Brockarchaeota may occupy previously overlooked roles in anaerobic carbon cycling.

Indexed as

PhylogenyArchaeaCarbonCarbon CycleChinaGenome, ArchaealGeographyGeologic SedimentsHot SpringsHydrothermal VentsMetagenomeMethaneRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSpecies SpecificityCarbonMethaneRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID33893309
PMCPMC8065059
OpenAlexW3155316846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.