Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33893288›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Specificity of AMPylation of the human chaperone BiP is mediated by TPR motifs of FICD.

Joel Fauser, Burak Gulen, Vivian Pogenberg, Christian Pett, Danial Pourjafar-Dehkordi, Christoph Krisp, Dorothea Höpfner, Gesa König, Hartmut Schlüter, Matthias J Feige and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Inhibition of FicD-mediated AMPylation and deAMPylation by isoprenoid diphosphates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. AMPylation: key roles in biological regulation across prokaryotes and eukaryotes.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The functional dynamics of FicD's TPR domain are modulated by the interaction with ATP and BiP.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. FicD sensitizes cellular response to glucose fluctuations in mouse embryonic fibroblasts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. AMPylation and Endoplasmic Reticulum Protein Folding Homeostasis.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2023
    Review
  17. The Alarmone Diadenosine Tetraphosphate as a Cosubstrate for Protein AMPylation.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Production of an Active, Human Membrane Protein inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. The AMPylase FIC-1 modulates TGF-β signaling inFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Joel FauserDepartment of Biochemistry and Signal Transduction, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Burak GulenDepartment of Biochemistry and Signal Transduction, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2945-3428
Vivian PogenbergDepartment of Biochemistry and Signal Transduction, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1021-6804
Christian PettChemical Biology Center (KBC), Institute of Chemistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7039-7312
Danial Pourjafar-DehkordiPhysics Department T38, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Christoph KrispInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Mass Spectrometric Proteomics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Dorothea HöpfnerDepartment of Biochemistry and Signal Transduction, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0747-106X
Gesa KönigDepartment of Biochemistry and Signal Transduction, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Hartmut SchlüterInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Mass Spectrometric Proteomics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9358-7036
Matthias J FeigeCenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPSM), Department Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Martin ZachariasPhysics Department T38, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Christian HedbergChemical Biology Center (KBC), Institute of Chemistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. christian.hedberg@umu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0832-8276
Aymelt ItzenDepartment of Biochemistry and Signal Transduction, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany. a.itzen@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4249-5617
Universität Hamburg · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUmeå University · SECenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To adapt to fluctuating protein folding loads in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), the Hsp70 chaperone BiP is reversibly modified with adenosine monophosphate (AMP) by the ER-resident Fic-enzyme FICD/HYPE. The structural basis for BiP binding and AMPylation by FICD has remained elusive due to the transient nature of the enzyme-substrate-complex. Here, we use thiol-reactive derivatives of the cosubstrate adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to covalently stabilize the transient FICD:BiP complex and determine its crystal structure. The complex reveals that the TPR-motifs of FICD bind specifically to the conserved hydrophobic linker of BiP and thus mediate specificity for the domain-docked conformation of BiP. Furthermore, we show that both AMPylation and deAMPylation of BiP are not directly regulated by the presence of unfolded proteins. Together, combining chemical biology, crystallography and biochemistry, our study provides structural insights into a key regulatory mechanism that safeguards ER homeostasis.

Indexed as

Protein Processing, Post-TranslationalTetratricopeptide RepeatAdenosine MonophosphateAdenosine TriphosphateAmino Acid SequenceEndoplasmic ReticulumEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPHeat-Shock ProteinsHEK293 CellsHomeostasisHumansMembrane ProteinsMolecular Dynamics SimulationNucleotidyltransferasesProtein BindingProtein ConformationAdenosine MonophosphateAdenosine TriphosphateEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPFICD protein, humanHeat-Shock ProteinsMembrane ProteinsNucleotidyltransferases

Identifiers

PMID33893288
PMCPMC8065156
OpenAlexW3156303868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.