Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33893142›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2021

'The nurse did not even greet me': how informed versus non-informed patients evaluate health systems responsiveness in South Africa.

Dumisani MacDonald Hompashe, Ulf-G Gerdtham, Carmen S Christian, Anja Smith, Ronelle Burger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dumisani MacDonald HompasheEconomics, University of Fort Hare Faculty of Management and Commerce, Alice, South Africa dhompashe@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5652-719X
Ulf-G GerdthamEconomics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0647-7817
Carmen S ChristianEconomics, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-4740-6501
Anja SmithEconomics, Stellenbosch University Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-3135-4146
Ronelle BurgerEconomics, Stellenbosch University Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2463-5265

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUniversal Health Coverage is not only about access to health services but also about access to high-quality care, since poor experiences may deter patients from accessing care. Evidence shows that quality of care drives health outcomes, yet little is known about non-clinical dimensions of care, and patients' experience thereof relative to satisfaction with visits. This paper investigates the role of non-clinical dimensions of care in patient satisfaction.

methodsOur study describes the interactions of informed and non-informed patients with primary healthcare workers at 39 public healthcare facilities in two metropolitan centres in two South African provinces. Our analysis included 1357 interactions using standardised patients (for informed patients) and patients' exit interviews (for non-informed patients). The data were combined for three types of visits: contraception, hypertension and tuberculosis. We describe how satisfaction with care was related to patients' experiences of non-clinical dimensions.

resultsWe show that when real patients (RPs) reported being satisfied (vs dissatisfied) with a visit, it was associated with a 30% increase in the probability that a patient is greeted at the facilities. Likewise, when the RPs reported being satisfied (vs dissatisfied) with the visit, it was correlated with a 15% increase in the prospect that patients are pleased with healthcare workers' explanations of health conditions.

conclusionInformed patients are better equipped to assess health-systems responsiveness in healthcare provision. Insights into responsiveness could guide broader efforts aimed at targeted education and empowerment of primary healthcare users to strengthen health systems and shape expectations for appropriate care and conduct.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareUniversal Health InsuranceGovernment ProgramsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansSouth Africacross-sectional surveyhealth education and promotionhealth policyhealth systems evaluationpublic health

Identifiers

PMID33893142
PMCPMC8074562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.