Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33893112›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2021

Disrupting Irreversible Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation with an Engineered Enzyme.

Holly M Mayton, Sharon L Walker, Bryan W Berger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Enzymatic Biocontrol of Fire Blight (Environmental science & technology · 2026
    Article
  3. Integrating Bacteriocins and Biofilm-Degrading Enzymes to EliminateInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Enhancing the destruction ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Holly M MaytonDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Sharon L WalkerDepartment of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Bryan W BergerDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
University of Virginia · USDrexel University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilm formation is often attributed to postharvest bacterial persistence on fresh produce and food handling surfaces. In this study, a predicted glycosyl hydrolase enzyme was expressed, purified, and validated for the removal of microbial biofilms from biotic and abiotic surfaces under conditions used for chemical cleaning agents. Crystal violet biofilm staining assays revealed that 0.1 mg/ml of enzyme inhibited up to 41% of biofilm formation by Escherichia coli O157:H7, E. coli 25922, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, and Listeria monocytogenes. Furthermore, the enzyme was effective at removing mature biofilms, providing a 35% improvement over rinsing with a saline solution alone. Additionally, a parallel-plate flow cell was used to directly observe and quantify the impact of enzyme rinses on E. coli O157:H7 cells adhering to spinach leaf surfaces. The presence of 1 mg/liter enzyme resulted in nearly 6-times-higher detachment rate coefficients than a deionized (DI) water rinse, while the total cells removed from the surface increased from 10% to 25% over the 30-min rinse time, reversing the initial phases of biofilm formation. Enzyme treatment of all 4 cell types resulted in significantly reduced cell surface hydrophobicity and collapse of negatively stained E. coli 25922 cells imaged by electron microscopy, suggesting potential polysaccharide surface modification of enzyme-treated bacteria. Collectively, these results point to the broad substrate specificity and robustness of the enzyme for different types of biofilm stages, solution conditions, and pathogen biofilm types and may be useful as a method for the removal or inhibition of bacterial biofilm formation.

Indexed as

Bacterial AdhesionBiofilmsEscherichia coliFood HandlingGlycoside HydrolasesHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsListeria monocytogenesPlant LeavesSalmonella typhimuriumSpinacia oleraceaGlycoside Hydrolasesbiofilmscell adhesiondisinfectantsexopolysaccharidefoodborne pathogenshydrolaselipopolysaccharideresistance

Identifiers

PMID33893112
PMCPMC8316139
OpenAlexW3153796534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.